Talk:First partner Pokémon/Featured article candidate: Difference between revisions
From Bulbapedia, the community-driven Pokémon encyclopedia.
Jump to navigationJump to search
Theryguy512 (talk | contribs) (sigh...) |
Tiddlywinks (talk | contribs) m (Tiddlywinks moved page Talk:Starter Pokémon/Featured article candidate to Talk:First partner Pokémon/Featured article candidate: Current terminology) |
||
| (4 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
====Support ( | ====Support (8)==== | ||
*This article is very informative of each starter of all the games as well as in other media. --[[Tracey Sketchit|<span style="color:#33CC66;">'''ケンジ'''</span>]][[User talk:Kenji-girl|<span style="color:#6600CC;">'''の'''</span>]][[User:Kenji-girl|<span style="color:#FF00CC;">'''ガール'''</span>]] 07:33, 13 August 2008 (UTC) | *This article is very informative of each starter of all the games as well as in other media. --[[Tracey Sketchit|<span style="color:#33CC66;">'''ケンジ'''</span>]][[User talk:Kenji-girl|<span style="color:#6600CC;">'''の'''</span>]][[User:Kenji-girl|<span style="color:#FF00CC;">'''ガール'''</span>]] 07:33, 13 August 2008 (UTC) | ||
*The article is quite good, compared to some others. It relates to both games and anime quite well, unlike some others.--[[User:Wowy|Wowy]] 07:36, 13 August 2008 (UTC) | *The article is quite good, compared to some others. It relates to both games and anime quite well, unlike some others.--[[User:Wowy|Wowy]] 07:36, 13 August 2008 (UTC) | ||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
*I think the article is very well written, and quite informative. It gets two thumbs up from me. [[User:Alphateam7911|Alphateam7911]] 01:49, 8 April 2009 (UTC) | *I think the article is very well written, and quite informative. It gets two thumbs up from me. [[User:Alphateam7911|Alphateam7911]] 01:49, 8 April 2009 (UTC) | ||
====Object ( | *Good article, should be a F.A.[[User:Pokenick]] | ||
====Object (8)==== | |||
* While I ''do'' like this article, I feel it's a little too much of a list to be featured. First it's a long list of starters in the games, then it's a ridiculously long list of trivia points... --[[User:ElectAbuzzzz|electAbuzzzz]] <sup>([[User talk:ElectAbuzzzz|TALK]])</sup> 09:28, 13 August 2008 (UTC) | * While I ''do'' like this article, I feel it's a little too much of a list to be featured. First it's a long list of starters in the games, then it's a ridiculously long list of trivia points... --[[User:ElectAbuzzzz|electAbuzzzz]] <sup>([[User talk:ElectAbuzzzz|TALK]])</sup> 09:28, 13 August 2008 (UTC) | ||
* Ditto to the above. There are much better articles out there. [[User:Aura-Knight|Aura-Knight]] 15:57, 22 August 2008 (UTC) | * Ditto to the above. There are much better articles out there. [[User:Aura-Knight|Aura-Knight]] 15:57, 22 August 2008 (UTC) | ||
| Line 15: | Line 17: | ||
*Agree with {{u|electAbuzzzz}} here.--'''[[User:Diby|<span style="color:#6890F0;">D</span><span style="color:#F08030;">i</span>]]'''[[User talk:Diby|<span style="color:#78C850;">b</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Diby|<span style="color:#F8D030;">y</span>]] | *Agree with {{u|electAbuzzzz}} here.--'''[[User:Diby|<span style="color:#6890F0;">D</span><span style="color:#F08030;">i</span>]]'''[[User talk:Diby|<span style="color:#78C850;">b</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Diby|<span style="color:#F8D030;">y</span>]] | ||
*Definitely not. You call this a featured article? It's OK, but it's too plain to be one of the best. [[User:Dusknoir477]] 17:16, 24 Januray 2009 (UTC) | *Definitely not. You call this a featured article? It's OK, but it's too plain to be one of the best. [[User:Dusknoir477]] 17:16, 24 Januray 2009 (UTC) | ||
*[[Image:Spr 4d 132.png]] to {{u|electAbuzzzz}}. It can be improved, though. Fix the trivia and a few other things, and I will change my mind. [[User:Alpha Totodile|<span style="color:black;">'''Alpha'''</span>]] [[User talk:Alpha Totodile|<span style="color:blue;">'''Totodile'''</span>]] 23:15, 14 April 2009 (UTC) | |||
*Meh. BLAND. No. Just fancy pictures, nothing really unique about it. [[User:Ht14|<span style="color:#D5AA00"><sup>''ht''</sup></span>]][[User talk:Ht14|<span style="color:#C0C0C0"><small>''14''</small></span>]] 02:25, 20 April 2009 (UTC) | |||
====Other comments==== | ====Other comments==== | ||
Latest revision as of 02:48, 9 March 2024
Support (8)
- This article is very informative of each starter of all the games as well as in other media. --ケンジのガール 07:33, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
- The article is quite good, compared to some others. It relates to both games and anime quite well, unlike some others.--Wowy 07:36, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
- After going through it for a while, I've decided that it does indeed deserve to be a Featured Article. It's very informative.--Kkllnn blastoise 23:55, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
- Support --Guardian of Earth |SGMS 2010
- Support; This article is good well written "ehh.." trivia but still a good article.--☆Coolピカチュウ! 07:49, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
- I think the article is quite interesting, and it is about most aspects of Pokémon (Games, Anime, Ect...) Elliot 08:59, 13 December 2008 (UTC)
- I think the article is very well written, and quite informative. It gets two thumbs up from me. Alphateam7911 01:49, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
- Good article, should be a F.A.User:Pokenick
Object (8)
- While I do like this article, I feel it's a little too much of a list to be featured. First it's a long list of starters in the games, then it's a ridiculously long list of trivia points... --electAbuzzzz (TALK) 09:28, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
- Ditto to the above. There are much better articles out there. Aura-Knight 15:57, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
- Agreed. It's good, but too much of a list to be considered featured. Arceus548 17:49, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
- There are some problems I noticed with it too - such as the fact it still claimed that Jessie's Arbok was a gift from Giovanni, while that comment was removed from the main article years ago. If that error was still in there, I wouldn't be surprised if there are other little errors it has that I didn't see. If this is to become a featured article, it needs to be less of a list, and it should have a thorough clean up. Right now, it's not featured material. Satosuke 14:23, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
- Agree with electAbuzzzz here.--Diby
- Definitely not. You call this a featured article? It's OK, but it's too plain to be one of the best. User:Dusknoir477 17:16, 24 Januray 2009 (UTC)
to electAbuzzzz. It can be improved, though. Fix the trivia and a few other things, and I will change my mind. Alpha Totodile 23:15, 14 April 2009 (UTC)- Meh. BLAND. No. Just fancy pictures, nothing really unique about it. ht14 02:25, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
