User talk:Missingno. Master/Archive1

←

Missingno. Master's Talk Page Archives

→

NOTICE: This page is an archive of Missingno. Master's talk page. All discussion is to be held on his current talk page.

Categories need to be categorized. TTEchidna 00:50, 19 October 2007 (UTC)

...and don't forget to spell them right. It's much harder to move categories. Always accent the é in Pokémon. ALWAYS. TTEchidna 00:57, 19 October 2007 (UTC)

All right. Sorry about that, I'm used to Wikipedia, where they don't care about the é. - unsigned comment from Missingno. Master (talk • contribs)

Really? They don't? Somewhat pathetic, if you think about it. Oh, and make sure to sign your talk-page contributions. -Politoed666

They also don't care about proper patterns, if you'll see Mercury and Venus... TTEchidna 05:04, 19 October 2007 (UTC)

Contents

Hide

Close table of contents

• (Return to top)
• Categorize
• NO SPECULATION!
• Unevolved Pokémon w/ Trick Room
• Missingno
• Thank you
• MissingNo.......in the ANIME??????
• Support
• I am tired of talking under all of that
• Great...another idea thief.
• Signature

Contents

Categorize

Categorize your freakin pages. Also, don't make non-notable Pokémon pages. Tina ^δ♫ 20:32, 7 December 2007 (UTC)

NO SPECULATION!

Please, don't put in rumours, speculations, or false info on pages. Only make CONFIRMED edits! --Theryguy512 12:09, 11 December 2007 (UTC)

Precisely. How do you know it won't be Brock's Happiny that evolves? Or Dawn's Piplup? All that was stated was that a main character's Pokémon may evolve. --PAK Man ^Talk 16:05, 11 December 2007 (UTC)

For all we know, there could be no evolution. And if there is a main character evolution, here are the possibilities: Ash's Staravia to Staraptor, Ash's Turtwig to Grotle, Ash's Chimchar to Monferno, Ash's Buizel to Floatzel, Dawn's Piplup to Prinplup, Dawn's Buneary to Lopunny, Dawn's Aipom to Ambipom, Brock's Croagunk to Toxicroak, Brock's Happiny to Chansey, or James's Mime Jr. to Mr. Mime.

Now, if I were placing money on these, I would not bet on Staravia, Turtwig, Buneary, or Croagunk evolving. I'd only bet on Buizel or Aipom if they evolved together, and I'd only bet on Dawn's Piplup if Kenny's Prinplup also evolves before or during DP061. My main bet would be on Chimchar, with a secondary bet on Mime Jr. That's my 2¢. --Shiningpikablu252 16:15, 11 December 2007 (UTC)

First off, how do I know Happiny or Piplup won't evolve? I read on Serebiiforums that it was posted on PokéAni that an APE/MONKEY Pokémon would evolve. Notice Happiny and Piplup are not ape/monkey Pokémon. If necessary, I'll get the link to where this was posted. Missingno. Master 19:10, 11 December 2007 (UTC)

Pleasew get the link....I'm curious --Theryguy512 22:51, 11 December 2007 (UTC)

Here. I would've gotten the link to where it says so on PokéAni, but it seems to be all Japanese, of which I don't know any.

According to this thread, the part about the "monkey" is only somebody randomly saying "monkey."

Regardless of what the post on PokéAni says, it should not be mentioned in either Dawn's Aipom or Ash's Chimchar's articles, because at this time, it is just speculation. --PAK Man ^Talk 03:06, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

Unevolved Pokémon w/ Trick Room

Kirlia and Ralts can pull off the Trick Room and Destiny Bond trick too. Destiny Bond's an Egg Move :P Tina ^δ♫ 20:16, 14 December 2007 (UTC)

Plus it's a better idea to just train to 252 EVs and use the extra three in another stat. I do that all the time. TTEchidna^G_SDS! 19:51, 19 December 2007 (UTC)

Missingno

Missingno is not an actual Pokémon. Please stop trying it to treat it so, like adding it to the Pokémon category, or replacing Arceus with Missingno on Bulbasaur's page.. Tina ^δ♫ 19:23, 16 December 2007 (UTC)

DUDE! Missingno is NOT A POKÉMON! Please DON'T put [[Category:Pokémon]] on its page! It's NOT a Pokémon! MERRY CHRISTMAS 19:25, 16 December 2007 (UTC)

Alright, alright, I get it, I get it! Missingno. is not a Pokémon. Got it. Missingno. Master 19:28, 16 December 2007 (UTC)

...we seriously don't need to make Missingno's article look like a real Pokémon. :/ It's not one, and that's it. Geez. Tina ^δ♫ 20:44, 19 December 2007 (UTC)

Thank you

I never go a day with thanking someone. I just wanted to quickly thank you for rewording that Meowth trivia fact I made. Thanks. -Mudkipchan 19:32, 20 December 2007 (UTC)

No problem. Missingno. Master 02:28, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

MissingNo.......in the ANIME??????

You are getting to far into MissingNo.. You're making it look like a real Pokémon. And Dude, how could a GLITCH appear in the ANIME?????? MERRY CHRISTMAS 14:31, 26 December 2007 (UTC)

As far as we know, those standard ghosts were literal ghosts, not a Missingno in a ghost form. If they were to have been Missingno, then why is the picture of Ash and his team in the Orange League Hall of Fame crystal-clear when Missingno is known to corrupt Hall of Fame data? --Shiningpikablu252 14:46, 26 December 2007 (UTC)

Because encountering MissingNo. corrupts Hall of Fame data that exists WHEN you run into Missingno.. Any Hall of Fame data created after encountering Missingno. is safe until MissingNo. is encountered again. Missingno. Master 19:32, 26 December 2007 (UTC)

Okay Missingno. being in the anime kinda seems farfetch. But it isn't impossible.Pokemaniac102 19:35, 26 December 2007 (UTC)

I will be watching EP020 to see.Pokemaniac102 19:37, 26 December 2007 (UTC)

Pokemaniac102: THANK YOU. Finally, a voice of reason! It's not beyond the limits of the writers to put a glitch Pokémon in the anime! Missingno. Master 19:43, 26 December 2007 (UTC)

*Watching EP020 on Youtube* *See's the ghosts* *SCREAMS* Man that was scary. Of course it's possible to put it in the anime. Missingno. seems to be the real-est glitch pokémon there is.Pokemaniac102 19:46, 26 December 2007 (UTC)

Sigh.....Please get me a link to the video. MERRY CHRISTMAS 20:01, 26 December 2007 (UTC)

Sigh.....It appears in this part of the episode[1]Pokemaniac102 20:02, 26 December 2007 (UTC)

You mean those skull ghosts???? Those aren't MissingNo.s! There's Gastlys in disguise! MERRY CHRISTMAS 20:10, 26 December 2007 (UTC)

Actually there was only one Gastly in the episode.Pokemaniac102 20:10, 26 December 2007 (UTC)

Besides, if they were other Gastly in disguise, the Pokédex would've identified them. Missingno. Master 20:12, 26 December 2007 (UTC)

Yes and why are you making such a fuss? I'm a guy who can except anything that happens to the Pokémon world.Pokemaniac102 20:13, 26 December 2007 (UTC)

Literal ghost has an "In the anime" section. As far as continuity is concerned, the ghosts in EP020 were literal ghosts, not Missingno in a ghost form. Besides, at this point, Ash had only three badges and was nowhere near Cinnabar Island yet, and given how the closest game coast to Saffron City is in Celadon City, I highly doubt Missingno could have appeared here. --Shiningpikablu252 21:17, 26 December 2007 (UTC)

That could be true. But I'm staying on Missingno. Master's side this time. I agree that it could be MissingNo. The Pokémon World was created by man (Mainly Satoshi Tajiri), and man can make anything happen in the Pokémon world. I think Missingno. Master thinks the same.Pokemaniac102 21:35, 26 December 2007 (UTC)

And I think you're right. Missingno. Master 23:22, 26 December 2007 (UTC)

I think I'm thanking you.Pokemaniac102 23:24, 26 December 2007 (UTC)

I think you're welcome. Missingno. Master 23:49, 26 December 2007 (UTC)

I think we can stop with the "I think"s.Pokemaniac102 23:52, 26 December 2007 (UTC)

I think- I mean, I agree. Missingno. Master 23:53, 26 December 2007 (UTC)

Okay now you're just cutting it close. Bye. My sister took the charger and I'm low on battery.Pokemaniac102 23:56, 26 December 2007 (UTC)

Nevermind. I'm back and you didn't even say anything.Pokemaniac102 00:25, 27 December 2007 (UTC)

Couldn't say anything. My mother took over the computer. I only just got back on. Missingno. Master 01:38, 27 December 2007 (UTC)

Glitch Pokémon.  Official Pokémon.  There is little difference separating the two.  In my view, Glitch Pokémon and official Pokémon should be considered equal!  (the above comment has been approved by Missingno. Master) 22:14, 28 December 2007 (UTC)== Sig test! ==

Using this part to test my new sig. Glitch Pokémon. Official Pokémon. There is little difference separating the two. In my view, Glitch Pokémon and official Pokémon should be considered equal! (the above comment has been approved by Missingno. Master) 22:13, 28 December 2007 (UTC)

Test is successful. Glitch Pokémon. Official Pokémon. There is little difference separating the two. In my view, Glitch Pokémon and official Pokémon should be considered equal! (the above comment has been approved by Missingno. Master) 22:14, 28 December 2007 (UTC)

Oh man..that episode is totally anti-Christian...I mean, the cross is supposed to signify power and yet it was USELESS against the Gastly. We can thank God that the anime has changed. By the way, the skull ghosts were illusions by Gastly...Optimatum♏^Talk|♊Hi 13:27, 30 December 2007 (UTC)

Support

Am I the only one on this website that also thinks Glitch Pokémon and Official Pokémon should be treated equally?^Po_ke^ma_ni^ac₁0²♪_♫ 22:32, 28 December 2007 (UTC)

You think so, too? YES! Glitch Pokémon. Official Pokémon. There is little difference separating the two. In my view, Glitch Pokémon and official Pokémon should be considered equal! (the above comment has been approved by Missingno. Master) 22:32, 28 December 2007 (UTC)

YUP!!!! But are you gonna use the MissingNo. Menu Sprite for it. It's a little BIG^Po_ke^ma_ni^ac₁0²♪_♫ 22:34, 28 December 2007 (UTC)

You really think so? Glitch Pokémon. Official Pokémon. There is little difference separating the two. In my view, Glitch Pokémon and official Pokémon should be considered equal! (the above comment has been approved by Missingno. Master) 22:35, 28 December 2007 (UTC)

yes. and why don't you try making the words smaller?^Po_ke^ma_ni^ac₁0²♪_♫ 22:36, 28 December 2007 (UTC)

Like this? Glitch Pokémon. Official Pokémon. There is little difference separating the two. In my view, Glitch Pokémon and official Pokémon should be considered equal! (the above comment has been approved by Missingno. Master) 22:38, 28 December 2007 (UTC)

Yes. No offense, but that sig takes way too much space.^Po_ke^ma_ni^ac₁0²♪_♫ 22:39, 28 December 2007 (UTC)

Changed it. Is this any better? Glitch Pokémon. Official Pokémon. There is little difference separating the two. In my view, Glitch Pokémon and official Pokémon should be considered equal! 22:41, 28 December 2007 (UTC)

YES but the message is too long. Try to shorten it. Why don't you use the menu sprite instead of the big picture?^Po_ke^ma_ni^ac₁0²♪_♫ 22:42, 28 December 2007 (UTC)

I like the big picture. I'll try to shorten the message somewhat, though. Glitch Pokémon. Official Pokémon. There is little difference separating the two. In my view, Glitch Pokémon and official Pokémon should be considered equal! 22:43, 28 December 2007 (UTC)

What's your favorite color? I'll see if i can make one for you.^Po_ke^ma_ni^ac₁0²♪_♫ 22:48, 28 December 2007 (UTC) Favorite color? Red. Glitch Pokémon. Official Pokémon. In my opinion, the two should be considered equal! 22:49, 28 December 2007 (UTC)

How bout this?^Po_ke^ma_ni^ac₁0²♪_♫ 22:54, 28 December 2007 (UTC)

Glitch Pokémon and Official Pokémon There is no real difference between the two. In my opinion, the two should be considered equal!

That's PERFECT! Thanks!

Glitch Pokémon and Official Pokémon There is no real difference between the two. In my opinion, the two should be considered equal! 22:57, 28 December 2007 (UTC)

I fixed it.^Po_ke^ma_ni^ac₁0²♪_♫ 22:59, 28 December 2007 (UTC)

Ah, I see. Thanks.

Glitch Pokémon and Official Pokémon There is no real difference between the two. In my opinion, the two should be considered equal!

23:01, 28 December 2007 (UTC)

I am tired of talking under all of that

I fixed it. Oh and I listed you on my page.^Po_ke^ma_ni^ac₁0²♪_♫ 23:00, 28 December 2007 (UTC)

I fixed it. Don't worry.^Po_ke^ma_ni^ac₁0²♪_♫ 23:02, 28 December 2007 (UTC)

I thought you already fixed it.

Glitch Pokémon and Official Pokémon There is no real difference between the two. In my opinion, the two should be considered equal!

23:03, 28 December 2007 (UTC)

Glitch Pokémon and Official Pokémon There is no real difference between the two. In my opinion, the two should be considered equal!

testingtesting. Should work.^Po_ke^ma_ni^ac₁0²♪_♫ 23:08, 28 December 2007 (UTC)

Alright. Now let's see.

Glitch Pokémon and Official Pokémon There is no real difference between the two. In my opinion, the two should be considered equal!

23:09, 28 December 2007 (UTC)

IT WORKS!

Glitch Pokémon and Official Pokémon There is no real difference between the two. In my opinion, the two should be considered equal!

23:09, 28 December 2007 (UTC)

YES. HAPPY BIRTHAY! I listed you on my userpage. It will spread the word about how they should be treated equally.^Po_ke^ma_ni^ac₁0²♪_♫ 23:10, 28 December 2007 (UTC)

You did? Hey, thanks!

Glitch Pokémon and Official Pokémon There is no real difference between the two. In my opinion, the two should be considered equal!

23:11, 28 December 2007 (UTC)

Thanks. Your beliefs said in that signagture helped fill in a vital part in my fanfic.^PokeManiac₁₀₂17:28, 29 December 2007 (UTC)

Great...another idea thief.

Did you just think of the 'new messages' sign? Because my talk page's sign happened to have the same format...clarify. Optimatum♏^Talk|♊Hi 13:15, 30 December 2007 (UTC)

No, actually, I got the idea from another user's page. I can't remember which one it was, though... Might've been yours. If it was yours, I apologize. Just say the word, I'll remove the thing in an instant.

Glitch Pokémon and Official Pokémon There is no real difference between the two. In my opinion, the two should be considered equal!

13:21, 30 December 2007 (UTC)

Well...Stinkoman and Espeon3XX had them too...Optimatum♏^Talk|♊Hi 13:28, 30 December 2007 (UTC)

Signature

Tables for a signature aren't really that great of an idea.. because then you have this big block of code, and then it looks tacky with other people's comments under it. Tina ^δ♫ 21:18, 30 December 2007 (UTC)

Not really. That's just your opinion^Po_ke^ma_ni^ac₁0²♪_♫ 21:21, 30 December 2007 (UTC)

No, seriously. Things that don't line up with your text aren't good signatures. Tina ^δ♫ 21:26, 30 December 2007 (UTC)

Remember the bunny Ph34r4ever had in his signature? He had to take that down because it was too large. I think this one has the same problem... Tina ^δ♫ 21:27, 30 December 2007 (UTC)

I'm always gonna be on Missingno. Master's side so I'm gonna be okay with whatever he does.^Po_ke^ma_ni^ac₁0²♪_♫ 21:29, 30 December 2007 (UTC)

Well, once again, I'm on Tina the Great's side! --Theryguy512 21:32, 30 December 2007 (UTC)

Because you along with Ivan love her. ^Po_ke^ma_ni^ac₁0²♪_♫ 21:32, 30 December 2007 (UTC)

...I saw that, my dear Wattson. I don't fall for cute girls that easily (whoops, gave the slip) Optimatum♏^Talk|♊Hi 04:37, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

• sigh* Just leave Tina alone. --Theryguy512 14:00, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

AUGH! BEEG SEEG! Optim^Иван♫ 06:56, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

What was that about? --Theryguy512 14:29, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

Big sig. I hate long codecs...Ph34r4ever^{Talk page♊}11:36 9 Feb 2008

11:36, 9 February 2008 (UTC)

CRAP!!! DID IT AGAIN!!! Ph34r4ever^{Talk page♊}11:36 9 Feb 2008