User talk:MegaNerd18

From Bulbapedia, the community-driven Pokémon encyclopedia.
Jump to: navigation, search

Archive: User talk:MegaNerd18/Archive 1

Archived talk pages

Please remember to link to your archived talk page(s) on your new talk page (preferably at the top, where it's easily visible). Thanks! Tiddlywinks (talk) 15:45, 20 April 2016 (UTC)

Edit warring

Please do not continually revert edits, it falls under edit warring and is a blockable offense. If you disagree with an edit, go to the talk page of the conflicting article or go to the talk page of the user that reverted you, do not revert them back. Thank you.--ForceFire 12:37, 16 July 2017 (UTC)

So why not tell that to the original reversion? As you say, if they disagree with the edits I made, they could've gone to the talk page. You do love your double standards here on Bulbapedia don't you? For that matter, what about yourself? You also took part, so are you not edit warring as well? Seems like you should block yourself as well. MegaNerd18 (talk) 12:42, 16 July 2017 (UTC)
I'm not the one the keeps adding the removed information back, and you were reverted by two separate admins who reverted you once compared to your twice.--ForceFire 12:47, 16 July 2017 (UTC)
First; no, I did not revert twice. Second, being an admin shouldn't exempt you from the rules, though evidently that's the double standard around here. Honestly, with how stuck up and protective you are of the pages, why even bother using a wiki format? It's clear you don't actually want anyone except your select circle to edit anything, unless it's tiny spelling corrections or whatnot. That's pretty much a complete spit in the face of the point of this format. So why bother with it? You're just pretending to be something you're not, and the 'anyone can edit' claim on the front is effectively a lie. MegaNerd18 (talk) 12:54, 16 July 2017 (UTC)
You added it twice. If something you've added is in dispute, don't just keep adding it, because if it keeps getting removed, clearly there's a problem and a discussion needs to be taken.--ForceFire 13:01, 16 July 2017 (UTC)