User talk:Edgreen293

From Bulbapedia, the community-driven Pokémon encyclopedia.
Jump to: navigation, search
Welcome to Bulbapedia, Edgreen293!
Bulbapedia bulb.png

By creating your account you are now able to edit pages, join discussions, and expand the community-driven Pokémon encyclopedia. Before you jump in, here are some ground rules:

  • Be nice to everyone. It's in the code of conduct.
  • Make good edits. Preview them before you save to make sure they're perfect the first time around.
  • Use wikicode and link templates when adding content to a page.
  • Use proper grammar and spelling, and read the manual of style.
  • You can't create a userpage until you've added to the encyclopedia. It's a privilege. See the userspace policy.
  • Use talk pages to resolve editing disputes. Don't "edit war," or constantly re-edit/undo the same thing on a page.
  • If you have a question about something, be proactive. Take a look at our FAQ. If you're still stuck, ask for help. The staff won't bite.
  • Sign all talk page posts with four tildes (~~~~). This will turn into your name and the time you wrote the comment.
  • For more handy links, see the welcome portal.
Thank you, and have a good time editing here!
  GrammarFreak01 (talk) 22:08, 6 May 2018 (UTC)  
 

S21

Please do not unhide events or episodes that have not been announced or aired in the dub yet, wait until they have been announced before unhiding them.--ForceFire 04:14, 7 May 2018 (UTC)

Again, please do not unhide events that have yet to occurred in the dub. Wait until the episode airs to unhide it.--ForceFire 03:14, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

Your edit on Everett

Even though you undid your edit a minute earlier, I'd highly advise you not to restore content deleted by an admin with a justified explanation. It's particularly sneaky if you reword the disputed content. Use the talk page if you disagree with a reversion. GrammarFreak01 (talk) 00:14, 17 May 2018 (UTC)

Red links

Please don't remove red links. If you want them gone, start a new article. --Mikuri 13:58, 19 May 2018 (UTC)

Edit warring

Please do not continuously add back reverted information, it falls under edit warring and is a blockable offense. Most of your edits that have been reverted were pointless edits. If you disagree, you can take it up to the talk page of the user that reverted you. Thank you.--ForceFire 03:39, 28 May 2018 (UTC)

I sorta beat you to the punch, but I'll remove my warning out of courtesy. :) GrammarFreak01 (talk) 03:41, 28 May 2018 (UTC)
Actually, since you warned him first, it's fine to remove my comment. But oh well.--ForceFire 03:42, 28 May 2018 (UTC)
Well, since you're an admin and I'm not, I felt the warning would be taken more seriously if you made it. GrammarFreak01 (talk) 03:43, 28 May 2018 (UTC)

Your recent editing spree

Unless the words you're applying will completely change the meaning of a sentence in a beneficial way for an article, there is simply no need to do what you recently did to a number of articles. Especially since your changes simply consisted of replacing one noun with another. Also, clip episodes such as DP120 must not be mentioned in character articles. GrammarFreak01 (talk) 19:23, 28 May 2018 (UTC)

I notice you're now trying to do the opposite thing. However, my warning applies to that as well. I will reiterate: if your changes do not change the meaning of a sentence in a beneficial way for an article, there is simply no need to make such edits. It doesn't matter how the sentence was originally structured. GrammarFreak01 (talk) 19:52, 28 May 2018 (UTC)
You're still doing it! Force Fire warned you before that doing such things is a blockable offense, and they weren't kidding around when they said that. Please think long and hard next time before you make such an edit again. If you feel you're in the right here, PLEASE discuss it with me on the talk page first. I think we can come to some sort of agreement. GrammarFreak01 (talk) 02:25, 29 May 2018 (UTC)

Blocked

Since it is clear that you have not read your talk page and continued to make pointless edits, you have been blocked for a week. As I've said before, do not add back your reverted edits, discuss it with the user that reverted you. Most of your edits were completely unnecessary and minor. I have given you the ability to respond on your talk page so you can explain yourself. If you return after your block and continue to make pointless edits, you will be handed a longer block. Thank you.--ForceFire 02:31, 29 May 2018 (UTC)

Once again...

You come back after a one-week block, and the first thing you do is do the same edits that got you blocked in the first place ([1] [2] [3]). Let me reiterate: Unless the words you're applying will completely change the meaning of a sentence in a beneficial way for an article, there is simply no need to do what you're doing. Especially since your changes simply consist of replacing one noun with another. I urge you to discuss this with me on the talk page if you intend to continue, otherwise you will risk a longer block. GrammarFreak01 (talk) 21:04, 5 June 2018 (UTC)

Blocked, once more

Since you have returned to make the same edits, it's clear that you have not read your talk page or are not taking the messages seriously. Do not continuously add back your edits, they were reverted because they were unnecessary edits. If you disagree, you can discuss it with the user that reverted you, do not re-add what was reverted. If you ignore your messages again and continue to make the same edits, you will be moved on.--ForceFire 05:08, 6 June 2018 (UTC)

Recent edits

Hi Edgreen293,

Please refrain from continuing to add ownership to flashbacks for various characters as you have been doing recently. It add nothing to the respective articles and in most cases no ownership can be given to the flashbacks, making the details your adding also inaccurate. If you are struggling to find things to do on Bulbapedia it may be an idea to ask someone for ideas or look at the incomplete articles list to see if you can assist in that space. GrammarFreak01 is currently undoing these additions to account for these two factors, so please refrain. If this message is unheeded and the behavior continues I will be bringing it up with an administrator.PardescanSlowbro (talk) 01:22, 20 January 2019 (UTC)

If we're talking about flashbacks in multiple episodes, there really is no need to specify whose flashback appeared in which episode. I can't imagine the benefit of sharing such trivial information. GrammarFreak01 (talk) 01:22, 20 January 2019 (UTC)
You were just informed why adding ownership to flashbacks for various characters was a bad idea. Please take the advice of other users seriously and desist, or an admin will catch wind of your unnecessary edits and block you again. Be advised that a potential block could be longer given your history. Thank you. GrammarFreak01 (talk) 03:10, 24 January 2019 (UTC)

Deceased characters

It must be explicitly stated or shown that a character has died. Assumptions are not allowed, no matter how obvious it is. There must be explicit confirmation, regardless of the fact that it's a kids show.--ForceFire 04:57, 12 February 2019 (UTC)