Talk:Mothim (Pokémon)

From Bulbapedia, the community-driven Pokémon encyclopedia.
Jump to: navigation, search

Cheryl's Mothim

Is it okay if I make a Cheryl's Mothim page? --Theryguy512 13:03, 20 October 2007 (UTC)

I wouldn't risk it. For one, Cheryl's not an important-enough character in the franchise to get a specific Pokémon article. For two, a Cheryl's Pokémon template would be murder to create! We'd have to include all of the Pokémon she's had over every medium--and when there's a large assortment of Battle Tower Pokémon to include, that's a lot! --Shiningpikablu252 14:09, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
Don't make it now. Maybe later if she ever reappears in the anime... maybe. TTEchidna 01:34, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
But it has appeared for three episodes of the anime.................--Theryguy512 01:46, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
Threre episodes is puny...Cheryl is a bit like the Character of the Day, you know (Although I wonder why they include articles on Gym Leader's Pokémon, after all, they too are characters of the day.) Agent 448δ | DP 01:47, 21 October 2007 (UTC)


It says that Mothim is the one of the only pokémon that is related to another with form differences. Shouldn't it have a sub-header that says it is the only one that is the evolved form of a pokémon with form differences? - unsigned comment from Joshsauce (talkcontribs)

Design basis related trivia mistake.

The Trivia section states, that of the four moth-based Pokémon, it is the only one which is part Flying-type. Then it mentions that Masquerain could be also based on a moth. However, it is clear that Masquerain at least draws inspiration from moths, as it's japanese Name is アメモース (Amemoth), making this section pointless.

Renoir (talk) 19:46, 17 August 2012 (UTC)

Point acknowledged. I very much agree with you. I'm going to remove that piece of trivia because that second point just makes the whole point untrue. --Pokemaster97 20:12, 17 August 2012 (UTC)