51,133
edits
Talk:Mismagius (Pokémon): Difference between revisions
From Bulbapedia, the community-driven Pokémon encyclopedia.
Jump to navigationJump to search
m
→Feminine?: Colons are used to indent on talk pages, not asterisks
Fossilgojira (talk | contribs) |
m (→Feminine?: Colons are used to indent on talk pages, not asterisks) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Feminine?== | ==Feminine?== | ||
Mismagius doesn't really look very feminine to me. Not like Misdreavus does. Wouldn't that piece of trivia be more accurate in the Misdreavus article? [[User:Buddy Christ|Buddy Christ]] | Mismagius doesn't really look very feminine to me. Not like Misdreavus does. Wouldn't that piece of trivia be more accurate in the Misdreavus article? [[User:Buddy Christ|Buddy Christ]] | ||
: Not entirely; while it may not look feminine to you, it certainly does to others. It's like saying Honchrow isn't overtly masculine despite being based on a mafia godfather. I'm not here to start a petty edit-war (too late), I just think it's appropriate for the trivia section. [[User:Fossilgojira|Fossilgojira]] 15:34, 31 March 2009 (UTC) | |||
::Opinionated. Gardevoir is an exception. It most certainly DOES look like a woman, but Mismagius can go either way.[[User:Totodilesentret|[[User:Totodilesentret|<font color="blue">Totodile</font><font color="brown">sentret!</font>]]<sup>[[User Talk:Totodilesentret|<font color="gold">Talk to me.</font>]]]] 15:36, 31 March 2009 (UTC) | |||
::: What is above me is also an opinion, and Gardevoir can be seen as a masculine creature if the beholder wishes. My entire point is that this IS trivial, just a little quirk that's worth mentioning, especially now considering the circumstances. [[User:Fossilgojira|Fossilgojira]] 15:45, 31 March 2009 (UTC) | |||
::::Just for the record, there is a proper term for a male with. They're typically called "warlocks". --[[User:Shiningpikablu252|Shiningpikablu252]] 17:04, 31 March 2009 (UTC) | |||
== Miasma == | == Miasma == | ||
