Talk:Selene (game): Difference between revisions

From Bulbapedia, the community-driven Pokémon encyclopedia.
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
Line 145: Line 145:
::Not to try to blame y'all or anything, but you're coming in here and seeing me as one of the only people saying anything, and even after I say anything nothing is changing. So you take me as the bad guy. I'm not. I'm frankly not interested in any side enough to argue about it here. You (the Selene people) could be right. Or the page could be right as is. Or Ailey could be right. The long and short of it is: aside from trying to cull out bad arguments, as far as I'm concerned, you all are mostly arguing with yourselves (and what you imagine me to be). [[User:Tiddlywinks|Tiddlywinks]] ([[User talk:Tiddlywinks|talk]]) 22:32, 8 October 2018 (UTC)
::Not to try to blame y'all or anything, but you're coming in here and seeing me as one of the only people saying anything, and even after I say anything nothing is changing. So you take me as the bad guy. I'm not. I'm frankly not interested in any side enough to argue about it here. You (the Selene people) could be right. Or the page could be right as is. Or Ailey could be right. The long and short of it is: aside from trying to cull out bad arguments, as far as I'm concerned, you all are mostly arguing with yourselves (and what you imagine me to be). [[User:Tiddlywinks|Tiddlywinks]] ([[User talk:Tiddlywinks|talk]]) 22:32, 8 October 2018 (UTC)
:::You ''do'' realise that right now it's literally the few Bulbapedia staff in this page vs everybody else, right? If anyone's arguments can be considered lackluster it's not the side who has posted links to multiple pieces of evidence from paraphernalia used by the official sites, and if the situation with internal data is going to be used, as I said before it doesn't make sense that it suddenly applies as substantial evidence in the staff's eyes in this situation when they wouldn't recognise it last year as such in regards to the statuses of the aforementioned Alolan legendaries. [[User:Azureprism|Azureprism]] ([[User talk:Azureprism|talk]]) 23:13, 8 October 2018 (UTC)
:::You ''do'' realise that right now it's literally the few Bulbapedia staff in this page vs everybody else, right? If anyone's arguments can be considered lackluster it's not the side who has posted links to multiple pieces of evidence from paraphernalia used by the official sites, and if the situation with internal data is going to be used, as I said before it doesn't make sense that it suddenly applies as substantial evidence in the staff's eyes in this situation when they wouldn't recognise it last year as such in regards to the statuses of the aforementioned Alolan legendaries. [[User:Azureprism|Azureprism]] ([[User talk:Azureprism|talk]]) 23:13, 8 October 2018 (UTC)
::::For me, the kicker is "Pokémon Trainer Selene, one of the player characters from Pokémon Sun and Pokémon Moon, is here with her three Pokémon friends: Rowlet, Popplio, and Litten!" [https://www.pokemoncenter.com/figures---pins/figures/figma/figma-selene-figure-703-03094]
::::The fact that an official Pokémon source refers to a player character by name directly and calls "Selene" "one of the player characters" kind of seals the deal to me.
::::In my opinion, we should be using the most official name we can get. We have one name that has been used by name explicitly, I think we should take what we can get and use that, rather than a name that has been used in some scenarios, but mostly as a situational thing, a la "Orlando" and "Anna" during the ORAS prerelease period.
::::Apologies if I'm mostly reiterating points that have already been made. --[[User:Celadonkey|Celadonkey]] 01:53, 9 October 2018 (UTC)
1,953

edits

Navigation menu