11,917
edits
Nescientist (talk | contribs) (→Protection: new section) |
|||
Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
I'm not sure if they count as an offical source, so I'll leave that up to your discretion. [[User:Skyarrow|Skyarrow]] ([[User talk:Skyarrow|talk]]) 06:20, 8 September 2016 (UTC) | I'm not sure if they count as an offical source, so I'll leave that up to your discretion. [[User:Skyarrow|Skyarrow]] ([[User talk:Skyarrow|talk]]) 06:20, 8 September 2016 (UTC) | ||
== Protection == | |||
May I ask, primarily out of interest, why you say that ''"Prerelease articles should not be editable by non-staff"''? Right now, I can understand how it makes sense to restrict access to some controversial articles or ones that have a history of being edited prematurely in some way (''"Speculation crackdown"''), but I wouldn't necessarily have derived a strict rule like that. (So, for example, I wouldn't have protected [[Lusamine]] in particular, as the article has basically only benefited from its non-protection.) [[User:Nescientist|Nescientist]] ([[User talk:Nescientist|talk]]) 00:41, 9 September 2016 (UTC) |