Talk:Grass (type): Difference between revisions

From Bulbapedia, the community-driven Pokémon encyclopedia.
Jump to navigationJump to search
→‎Rowlet: new section
(→‎Rowlet: new section)
Line 158: Line 158:
:Obviously status.--'''[[User:Dennou Zenshi|<font color="#AB0909">電</font><font color="#063A73">禅</font>]]<small>[[User talk:Dennou Zenshi|<font color="#fff" face="Tahoma"><span style="text-shadow:#000 0.2em 0.1em 0.1em; class=texhtml">Den Zen</span></font>]]</small>''' 11:40, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
:Obviously status.--'''[[User:Dennou Zenshi|<font color="#AB0909">電</font><font color="#063A73">禅</font>]]<small>[[User talk:Dennou Zenshi|<font color="#fff" face="Tahoma"><span style="text-shadow:#000 0.2em 0.1em 0.1em; class=texhtml">Den Zen</span></font>]]</small>''' 11:40, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
::There's no need to be mean about it. [[User:Tacopill|Tacopill]] ([[User talk:Tacopill|talk]]) 00:22, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
::There's no need to be mean about it. [[User:Tacopill|Tacopill]] ([[User talk:Tacopill|talk]]) 00:22, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
== Rowlet ==
The only thing we know for certain is that Rowlett is pure grass type since practically all starters are a solitary type prior to their first evolution therefore I don't think Rowlett should be added to the dual types even though it is obvious that it will evolve into a flying type eventually we don't know which evolution it will aquire that typing. I am hoping to go into the games as spoiler-free as possible unfortunatly I could not avoid be spoiled about the starters appearance and names therefore if I'm completely off the mark I do appologise, I would have altered the page if it were not for my spoiler-free attempt though I thought it would be a good point to bring up. The only reason I came here is because I wanted to see if there were any grass-flying types allready then I noticed Rowlett and decided to bring it up
48

edits

Navigation menu