User talk:Jello/Archive 3: Difference between revisions

From Bulbapedia, the community-driven Pokémon encyclopedia.
Jump to navigationJump to search
(No difference)

Revision as of 19:01, 2 May 2011

Those powers

I don't think I need them anymore, I'll get back to the job today, as well.—★Pika3323 21:38, 1 May 2011 (UTC)

Alright. If you need them again, let me know. Jellotalk 21:49, 1 May 2011 (UTC)
Your welcome.—★Pika3323 21:51, 1 May 2011 (UTC)

Re: don't intentionally go looking for these

Wait... why not? They are apparently important to be deleted? Why can't I try to help out by finding them? I am only trying to help? felinoel 05:06, 2 May 2011 (UTC)

Because our main concern is editing Bulbapedia articles. You're bringing up talk pages that had these comments from years ago and some comments actually do have something to do with the article. I appreciate you trying to help, but it's just not that big of a concern and we can handle it. Thanks. Jellotalk 05:14, 2 May 2011 (UTC)
I only brought up two, one was from four years ago and the other was a hypothetical question that would not improve the article from less than two months ago? felinoel 05:21, 2 May 2011 (UTC)
You stated on Adyniz's talk page that you were clicking random links to find such things, so clearly you would have continued to do this if I hadn't requested you to stop. Jellotalk 05:33, 2 May 2011 (UTC)
No? I said the Random Page link? You know the one that is this?
http://bulbapedia.bulbagarden.net/wiki/Special:Random
Who said I was going to stop, of course I was going to continue? Discussions that don't pertain to the article apparently need to be deleted? I still am wondering why you asked me to stop? felinoel 05:41, 2 May 2011 (UTC)
Requests and demands are two different things, and as I said before, we can handle it when needed. So it isn't any of your concern and your efforts would be appreciated elsewhere. This is a wiki and we as a whole should be be focusing on completing our articles not worrying about some petty comments on talk pages that should or should not be removed. And please don't patronize me, I do know what the random page link does. I'll be ending this discussion here now. Jellotalk 06:14, 2 May 2011 (UTC)
Key word in my last statement is "was" so please note its usage. My only confusion in this whole matter is that why my post out of so many others gets deleted and then I even get insulted for it? It is not my fault? I see constant posts in the talk page that don't completely and entirely have to do with the article? How am I supposed to know not to do it when there are so many others? Then when I try to prevent other people from making the same mistake I made by going to find all discussion that apparently are required to be removed from existence I get yelled at. Then when I stop doing it I get yelled at some more? Also for the record I was not patronizing you, it is very simple to misread something, I just assumed you misread my post and did not recognize what I meant so I linked you to it to prevent further misunderstanding, I link a lot, when you link people can understand much easier what I am talking about? felinoel 07:43, 2 May 2011 (UTC)