Talk:Unown (Pokémon)

Has anyone else noticed that the Unown O sprite is smaller than it should? -User:Groudon465/Sig 15:34, 28 October 2007 (UTC)

Yep. I think someone resized it to 64x64 or something, rather than 80x80. Tina^☆♥♫ 15:45, 28 October 2007 (UTC)

I recently fixed it, it was a different size than the rest, and it had a white background, so yeah... It's fine now. TTEchidna 01:18, 29 October 2007 (UTC)

Um... Do you have any idea what the tablet says in that picture? I've translated it from unown;

FRIEND
SUBETE NO I
BETSU NO IN
NANIKA WO

Any idea what this means? Im a bulba 02:48, 14 December 2007 (UTC)

DP040's trivia section has it. User:TTEchidna/sig 02:51, 14 December 2007 (UTC)

Legendary?

A book I have lists Unown as legendary. Is this accurate? (I don't have the book now, though) -- Glitch Pokémon. Official Pokémon. There is no real difference between the two. In my opinion, the two should be considered equal!-- quoted by Missingno. Master 20:12, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

No. Unown isn't legendary. It starred in a movie, but its stats cause barfing even moreso than Phione's, and.. erm, yeah. Tina ^δ♫ 20:13, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

Unown are Legendary Pokémon though, it states so in the movie. User:Tesh/Signature 21:13, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

No it means they are legends. If Phione is hardly considered legendary all of Unown's very SUCKISH stats make it absolutley NOT legendary. User:Crystallucario/Sig 22:20, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

Phione is legendary. It's confirmed by Pokémon.com. Unown are ancient and the like, but they aren't legendary. Tina ^δ♫ 22:28, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

I know thats why I said HARDLY CONSIDERED User:Crystallucario/Sig 22:38, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

Unown is legendary, then so is Arcanine. Dragonite. Tyranitar. Salamence. Metagross. Garchomp. Just because they have legends associated with them (Pokémon of legend) doesn't mean they're legendary. TTEchidnaFire echy 22:39, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

I always had the impression the were legendary. User:Tesh/Signature 18:17, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

Yea, same. User:Theryguy512/Sig 18:20, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

Let's review the facts. It can't breed (even with Ditto!), it's genderless, and it has legends associated with it. Sure it has piss-poor stats and is common as hell, but so is Phione, and if THAT thing is legendary, I don't see why this isn't! -- Glitch Pokémon. Official Pokémon. There is no real difference between the two. In my opinion, the two should be considered equal!-- quoted by Missingno. Master 11:52, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

There are no "rules" when it comes to legendaries. However, I do not count Unown as legendary. I mean look at it's place in the PokéDex. Wobbuffet comes after it. Plus, it has never been called a legendary. Legends and legendary are two different things. GlinnFile:Ani202MS.gif 12:01, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

Here lets vote... say YES or NO

I say NO User:Crystallucario/Sig 12:42, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

I say YES. User:Tesh/Signature 16:02, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

Yes. User:Theryguy512/Sig 16:23, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

YES GAH--User:Darth Cookie Monster/Sig 16:25, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

• Well I guess it is settled most of us think it is legendary so therefore-- it is... User:Crystallucario/Sig 18:18, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

How is it legendary? GlinnFile:Ani202MS.gif 03:17, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

There is no way that explains its legendary status. The only evidence that possibly signifies it being legendary is that there are many forms of it and it resides in an alternate dimensionUser:Pokemaniac102/Sig 03:20, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

NO NOT LEGENDARYUser:Pokemaniac102/Sig 03:20, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

Here, let's not vote. Unown is as legendary as Ditto is. Ditto can't breed with itself. Unown may be associated with legends, but it's not legendary in and of itself. TTEchidnaFire echy 03:55, 3 March 2008 (UTC)