Difference between revisions of "Talk:Pokégear/Featured article candidate"

From Bulbapedia, the community-driven Pokémon encyclopedia.
Jump to: navigation, search
(Support (2))
(Object (2))
Line 6: Line 6:
 
*I think the Anime section is a minor setback, but the rest of the article has a lot of hard work put into it and deserves to be featured. [[User:Pokemaster97|Pokemaster97]] 13:40, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
 
*I think the Anime section is a minor setback, but the rest of the article has a lot of hard work put into it and deserves to be featured. [[User:Pokemaster97|Pokemaster97]] 13:40, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
   
===Object (2)===
+
===Object (3)===
 
<!--Please remember to update the count along with your vote.-->
 
<!--Please remember to update the count along with your vote.-->
 
*The anime section is too list like for my liking. [[User:Turtwig A|<font color="#CD7F32">Turtwig's</font>]] [[Turtwig (Pokémon)|<font color="#FF7F00">A-B-Cs</font>]] ([[User talk:Turtwig A|<font color="#green">talk</font>]] | [[Special:Contributions/Turtwig A|<font color="#yellow">contribs</font>]]) 16:23, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
 
*The anime section is too list like for my liking. [[User:Turtwig A|<font color="#CD7F32">Turtwig's</font>]] [[Turtwig (Pokémon)|<font color="#FF7F00">A-B-Cs</font>]] ([[User talk:Turtwig A|<font color="#green">talk</font>]] | [[Special:Contributions/Turtwig A|<font color="#yellow">contribs</font>]]) 16:23, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
 
*I agree with Turtwig A. I think that if the Anime section could be rewritten or condensed so that it isn't such a big list, it would be a great featured article. That section, compared to the style of the rest of the article, is so different that it's somewhat jarring to me. [[User:Phantomjunkie|<span style="color:red">Phantom</span>]]♫[[User talk:Phantomjunkie|<span style="color:black">Junkie</span>]] 16:27, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
 
*I agree with Turtwig A. I think that if the Anime section could be rewritten or condensed so that it isn't such a big list, it would be a great featured article. That section, compared to the style of the rest of the article, is so different that it's somewhat jarring to me. [[User:Phantomjunkie|<span style="color:red">Phantom</span>]]♫[[User talk:Phantomjunkie|<span style="color:black">Junkie</span>]] 16:27, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
  +
*Too many lists, short anime section, no manga section (in PokeSpe pretty much everyone had a PokeGear, even in Hoenn). This article does have potential but it's still too early. --[[User:Maxim|Maxim]] 17:42, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
   
 
===Other comments===
 
===Other comments===

Revision as of 17:42, 29 August 2010

Pokégear

Support (3)

  • This is a good, detailed article that I believe deserves featured article status. Alex726 15:28, 22 August 2010 (UTC)
  • Read through the page and it looks like a lot of work has gone into this. Support. Gengarzilla 17:16, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
  • I think the Anime section is a minor setback, but the rest of the article has a lot of hard work put into it and deserves to be featured. Pokemaster97 13:40, 29 August 2010 (UTC)

Object (3)

  • The anime section is too list like for my liking. Turtwig's A-B-Cs (talk | contribs) 16:23, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
  • I agree with Turtwig A. I think that if the Anime section could be rewritten or condensed so that it isn't such a big list, it would be a great featured article. That section, compared to the style of the rest of the article, is so different that it's somewhat jarring to me. PhantomJunkie 16:27, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
  • Too many lists, short anime section, no manga section (in PokeSpe pretty much everyone had a PokeGear, even in Hoenn). This article does have potential but it's still too early. --Maxim 17:42, 29 August 2010 (UTC)

Other comments