Talk:List of Pokémon by Egg Group: Difference between revisions
(→Group coloration...: new section) |
|||
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
:I also think the setup is terrible. I think another LOP template is in order here; there would not be types, rather two spaces for the egg group, and it would all be in one sortable table. --[[User:SnorlaxMonster|<span style="color:#A70000">'''Snorlax'''</span>]][[User talk:SnorlaxMonster|<span style="color:#0000A7">'''Monster'''</span>]] 06:45, 13 November 2010 (UTC) | :I also think the setup is terrible. I think another LOP template is in order here; there would not be types, rather two spaces for the egg group, and it would all be in one sortable table. --[[User:SnorlaxMonster|<span style="color:#A70000">'''Snorlax'''</span>]][[User talk:SnorlaxMonster|<span style="color:#0000A7">'''Monster'''</span>]] 06:45, 13 November 2010 (UTC) | ||
::I thoroughly like the way you think, sir. Are you permitted to create said template? —<font face="Times New Roman">'''<span style="color:#60809F;">hexagon</span><span style="color:#AB2742;">THEORY</span>'''</font> 06:46, 13 November 2010 (UTC) | ::I thoroughly like the way you think, sir. Are you permitted to create said template? —<font face="Times New Roman">'''<span style="color:#60809F;">hexagon</span><span style="color:#AB2742;">THEORY</span>'''</font> 06:46, 13 November 2010 (UTC) | ||
== Group coloration... == | |||
How do you feel about that? If nothing else, I think it'd at least make the table look a little nicer. —<font face="Times New Roman">'''[[User:Hexagon Theory|<span style="color:#ab2742;">hexagon</span>]][[User_talk:Hexagon Theory|<span style="color:#60809f;">THEORY</span>]]'''</font> 09:31, 13 November 2010 (UTC) |
Revision as of 09:31, 13 November 2010
I'm mulling over how to do the 2-egg-group Pokémon without having duplicates of the same Pokémon. Ideas? Sidnoea 19:03, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
- There could combinations like Water 2/Monster or Plant/Ground or dragon/ground. Turtwig A Contributions Talk 00:16, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
Egg Group Names?
Where did these Egg Group Names come from, anyways? The Official Guide Books have them named differently. I think we should include both names, even though these are more common, or something. R S E FR LG 02:37, 17 October 2009 (UTC)
I would like to add Generation V to this...
I notice, however, that it's a terribly scrambled (why, for instance, does it need to be separated into groups like this?) page; even the template used for it is a hack. Do any higher-ups have suggestions for newer formatting or should I just add the new Pokémon using the current format? —hexagonTHEORY 06:50, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
- I also think the setup is terrible. I think another LOP template is in order here; there would not be types, rather two spaces for the egg group, and it would all be in one sortable table. --SnorlaxMonster 06:45, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
- I thoroughly like the way you think, sir. Are you permitted to create said template? —hexagonTHEORY 06:46, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
Group coloration...
How do you feel about that? If nothing else, I think it'd at least make the table look a little nicer. —hexagonTHEORY 09:31, 13 November 2010 (UTC)