Talk:James's Cacnea: Difference between revisions
From Bulbapedia, the community-driven Pokémon encyclopedia.
Jump to navigationJump to search
mNo edit summary |
|||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
:: Definitely either move this back (preferred) or move the above-mentioned Lickitung, Vulpix, and Primeape. [[User:Zurqoxn|Zurqoxn]] 02:32, 8 October 2007 (UTC) | :: Definitely either move this back (preferred) or move the above-mentioned Lickitung, Vulpix, and Primeape. [[User:Zurqoxn|Zurqoxn]] 02:32, 8 October 2007 (UTC) | ||
:::Forgetting that [[Benny]] and [[Anthony (Kanto)|Anthony]] are [[characters of the day]]? Articles on Pokémon belonging to a character of the day are, for the most part, considered non-notable here on Bulbapedia. [[Raichu (Pokémon)|Sugar]], [[Magneton (Pokémon)|Number Six]], and [[Raichu (Pokémon)|Kay's Raichu]] have been deleted as such. The only cases in which an article for a COTD's Pokémon would be considered notable is if the Pokémon would be considered a COTD in its own right, such as [[Puka]] and [[Orville]] ([[Nero]] wasn't successfully caught). --[[User:Shiningpikablu252|Shiningpikablu252]] 02:39, 8 October 2007 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 02:39, 8 October 2007
I am sorry, but I don't know how to edit the box with one's Pokémon. May someone please do it? ~Light
James Forever
I don't really like the idea of moving it to "Gardenia's Cacnea". It's still James' Pokémon, isn't it, even if given away. It's not called Benny's Lickitung, is it? And how often do you think Gardenia (or, indeed, Cacnea) is going to show up again? Once they leave Eternia, we'll never see either again. It's notable only as James' Pokémon, and should just get a brief mention that he left it behind with Gardenia at the end of the entry. That's it. --DarkfireTaimatsu 23:35, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
- I completely agree with DarkfireTaimatsu. It's not like Cacnea is going to a many character like Paul's Chimchar is.
- Truthfully I believe we should wait until the episodes premier before we go moving all the pages around. This is a future event after all and doing this could confuse people.
- And think about it. Do we also call them Anthony's Primeape or Susie's Vulpix? No we don't.
- And I know we call Haunter Sabrina's and I'm guessing that's why this idea was thought of. But think about it. Ash never formally caught Hunter and he only had it for two episodes. James's Cacnea has been with him for like what, over 200 episodes. Yeah, this was a mistake. --☆ケンジガール 00:26, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
- You know, the only reason we call the articles Sabrina's Haunter and Casey's Beedrill is because they were owned for rediculously short amounts of time. Cacnea was owned for practically the entire Hoenn arc, as well as the Battle Frontier and the first 52 episodes of Sinnoh. There is no reason why this should have been renamed. --PAK Man Talk 02:21, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
- Definitely either move this back (preferred) or move the above-mentioned Lickitung, Vulpix, and Primeape. Zurqoxn 02:32, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
- Forgetting that Benny and Anthony are characters of the day? Articles on Pokémon belonging to a character of the day are, for the most part, considered non-notable here on Bulbapedia. Sugar, Number Six, and Kay's Raichu have been deleted as such. The only cases in which an article for a COTD's Pokémon would be considered notable is if the Pokémon would be considered a COTD in its own right, such as Puka and Orville (Nero wasn't successfully caught). --Shiningpikablu252 02:39, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
