Talk:Copycat (Expedition 138): Difference between revisions
From Bulbapedia, the community-driven Pokémon encyclopedia.
Jump to navigationJump to search
(→Alternate origin: new section) |
|||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
:Well, technically, the concept of the Poké Kid has been around since [[Generation II]], as the children accompanying male [[Pokéfan]]s. It just wasn't split off into its own class until [[Generation IV]]. --[[User:Shiningpikablu252|Shiningpikablu252]] 00:58, 21 May 2010 (UTC) | :Well, technically, the concept of the Poké Kid has been around since [[Generation II]], as the children accompanying male [[Pokéfan]]s. It just wasn't split off into its own class until [[Generation IV]]. --[[User:Shiningpikablu252|Shiningpikablu252]] 00:58, 21 May 2010 (UTC) | ||
Well, that may be so, but still, it seems more likely that it was a Pikachu, doesn't it? [[User:Flyingtypefan|Flyingtypefan]] 19:22, 30 May 2010 (UTC) | Well, that may be so, but still, it seems more likely that it was a Pikachu, doesn't it? [[User:Flyingtypefan|Flyingtypefan]] 19:22, 30 May 2010 (UTC) | ||
== Alternate origin == | |||
Looks to me like [[Duplica]] from [[EP37]]. [[User:Eragon4|Eragon4]] ([[User talk:Eragon4|talk]]) 23:05, 9 April 2019 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 23:05, 9 April 2019
Poke kid or Pokemon?
It says that she was mimicking a Poke Kid, although that trainer class didn't exist yet, but it looks more like she was mimicking a Pikachu. Should i change that? Flyingtypefan 00:18, 21 May 2010 (UTC)
- Well, technically, the concept of the Poké Kid has been around since Generation II, as the children accompanying male Pokéfans. It just wasn't split off into its own class until Generation IV. --Shiningpikablu252 00:58, 21 May 2010 (UTC)
Well, that may be so, but still, it seems more likely that it was a Pikachu, doesn't it? Flyingtypefan 19:22, 30 May 2010 (UTC)
Alternate origin
Looks to me like Duplica from EP37. Eragon4 (talk) 23:05, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
