Talk:Charizard (Base Set 4)/Featured article candidate/Nomination 1: Difference between revisions
From Bulbapedia, the community-driven Pokémon encyclopedia.
Jump to navigationJump to search
ElectAbuzzzz (talk | contribs) m (Protected "Talk:Charizard (Base Set 4)/Featured article candidate/Nomination 1": old vote ([edit=sysop] (indefinite) [move=sysop] (indefinite))) |
|||
(9 intermediate revisions by 7 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
====Support ( | ====Support (7)==== | ||
*Likely the most in-depth TCG article there is, it should be the example for the rest. '''[[User:TTEchidna|<span style="color:#FF0000">''TTE''</span>]][[User talk:TTEchidna|chidna]]''' 00:03, 30 August 2008 (UTC) | *Likely the most in-depth TCG article there is, it should be the example for the rest. '''[[User:TTEchidna|<span style="color:#FF0000">''TTE''</span>]][[User talk:TTEchidna|chidna]]''' 00:03, 30 August 2008 (UTC) | ||
*Well, featured articles are meant to be examples for others and the TCG is lacking so it is good to find a card this in depth (compared to some others that are basically a set, release date and moves.) Also, it is the most well-known Pokémon card. [[User:Aura-Knight|Aura-Knight]] 16:49, 30 August 2008 (UTC) | *Well, featured articles are meant to be examples for others and the TCG is lacking so it is good to find a card this in depth (compared to some others that are basically a set, release date and moves.) Also, it is the most well-known Pokémon card. [[User:Aura-Knight|Aura-Knight]] 16:49, 30 August 2008 (UTC) | ||
*Now that article brings back memories... Anyhoo, amazing TCG article, it's insanely in-depth. Probably the best TCG Article here. - [[User:Kogoro|<span style="color:#DA70D6;">'''Kogoro'''</span>]] '''|''' [[User talk:Kogoro|<span style="color:#FFB6C1;">'''Talk to me'''</span>]] '''|''' 04:10, 17 October 2008 (UTC) | |||
*One of my favorite articles due to its subject, its description and its <s>plot</s> infomation. '''[[User:Optimatum|<span class="explain" title="Optimus35"><sc>Θρtιmαtum♏</sc></span>]]<sub>[[User talk:Optimatum|Talk]]|[[User:Optimatum/sig/Pikachu|Links]]</sub> 11:47, 24 November 2008 (UTC) | |||
*Despite what some may say, this article is clear-cut and straight to the point. [[User:Ht14|<span style="color:#D5AA00"><sup>''ht''</sup></span>]][[User talk:Ht14|<span style="color:#C0C0C0"><small>''14''</small></span>]] 04:00, 3 December 2008 (UTC) | |||
*It is the model for making trainer card pages, so I think this should be a FA! [[User:Christiangamer7|Ninjaboy]] 17:21, 7 February 2009 (UTC) | |||
*I concur with {{u|Kogoro}}, {{u|Aura-Knight}}, and {{u|TTEchidna}}. Very in-depth, and even though I'm not all that into the TCG, we need a TCG FA here. [[User:Alpha Totodile|<span style="color:black;">'''Alpha'''</span>]] [[User talk:Alpha Totodile|<span style="color:blue;">'''Totodile'''</span>]] 20:59, 14 April 2009 (UTC) | |||
====Oppose (1)==== | ====Oppose (1)==== |
Latest revision as of 20:13, 2 July 2009
Support (7)
- Likely the most in-depth TCG article there is, it should be the example for the rest. TTEchidna 00:03, 30 August 2008 (UTC)
- Well, featured articles are meant to be examples for others and the TCG is lacking so it is good to find a card this in depth (compared to some others that are basically a set, release date and moves.) Also, it is the most well-known Pokémon card. Aura-Knight 16:49, 30 August 2008 (UTC)
- Now that article brings back memories... Anyhoo, amazing TCG article, it's insanely in-depth. Probably the best TCG Article here. - Kogoro | Talk to me | 04:10, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
- One of my favorite articles due to its subject, its description and its
plotinfomation. Θρtιmαtum♏Talk|Links 11:47, 24 November 2008 (UTC) - Despite what some may say, this article is clear-cut and straight to the point. ht14 04:00, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
- It is the model for making trainer card pages, so I think this should be a FA! Ninjaboy 17:21, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
- I concur with Kogoro, Aura-Knight, and TTEchidna. Very in-depth, and even though I'm not all that into the TCG, we need a TCG FA here. Alpha Totodile 20:59, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
Oppose (1)
It's an good acticle but it's far below FA quality. MathijsP 06:56, 30 August 2008 (UTC)
Other comments
- It's good for a card article, but aren't featured articles supposed to have more... content? I'm not saying it should be improved, I mean, if we really start featuring monthly and there's nothing better, this could work - but compared to other FA, it's... lacking content. --electAbuzzzz (TALK) 09:34, 30 August 2008 (UTC)
- I admit TCG is underrated but there like Electabuzz said there might be a lot for a TCG but not enough for an FA. Also I think there are so many other FA's to choose and bit too much being nominated for the run up to be picked...--Wowy 07:39, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
- See comment on Bulbasaur. JirachiWishmaker0802 11:43, 16 September 2008 (UTC)