Talk:Battle Frontier (Generation III)/Featured article candidate: Difference between revisions

From Bulbapedia, the community-driven Pokémon encyclopedia.
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
==[[Battle Frontier (Generation III)]]==__NOTOC__
==[[Battle Frontier (Generation III)]]==__NOTOC__
====Support (6)====
====Support (7)====
<!--Please remember to update the count along with your vote.-->
<!--Please remember to update the count along with your vote.-->
*It's very good article with lots of information and nice tables/templates, and matches [[Battle Frontier (Generation IV)|Generation IV BF article]].----'''''無限の知性''''' ◎ [[User:Dennou Zenshi|<font color="#BF0B17">DENNOU</font>]]'''[[Special:Random|◆]]'''[[User talk:Dennou Zenshi|<font color="#1250A6">ZENSHI</font>]] 10:01, 20 November 2010 (UTC)
*It's very good article with lots of information and nice tables/templates, and matches [[Battle Frontier (Generation IV)|Generation IV BF article]].----'''''無限の知性''''' ◎ [[User:Dennou Zenshi|<font color="#BF0B17">DENNOU</font>]]'''[[Special:Random|◆]]'''[[User talk:Dennou Zenshi|<font color="#1250A6">ZENSHI</font>]] 10:01, 20 November 2010 (UTC)
Line 9: Line 9:
*Personally, I believe the article looks better when only using the current color as it fits the logo that way. [[User:Tempest370|Tempest370]] 18:11, 17 December 2010 (UTC)
*Personally, I believe the article looks better when only using the current color as it fits the logo that way. [[User:Tempest370|Tempest370]] 18:11, 17 December 2010 (UTC)
*I agree with SnorlaxMonster, it ''should'' have had more colors, but all in all it's an amazing article and definitely deserving of being a featured article. Eliza 17:49, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
*I agree with SnorlaxMonster, it ''should'' have had more colors, but all in all it's an amazing article and definitely deserving of being a featured article. Eliza 17:49, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
*The article is amazing and informative. I really don't think extra color is needed it looks nice and neat the way it does now. The pictures have high quality and tons of great tables. This deserves to be a featured article! [[User:Pokemaster97|<span style="color:Blue;">--Pokemaster</span>]][[User talk:Pokemaster97|<span style="color:Blue;">97</span>]] 17:58, 30 December 2010 (UTC)


====Object (0)====
====Object (0)====

Revision as of 17:58, 30 December 2010

Battle Frontier (Generation III)

Support (7)

  • It's very good article with lots of information and nice tables/templates, and matches Generation IV BF article.----無限の知性DENNOUZENSHI 10:01, 20 November 2010 (UTC)
  • While it would be nice if it had more colors than just Emerald Frontier, it is a very high-standard article that is now at level with BF4 (apart from colors). --SnorlaxMonster 12:31, 20 November 2010 (UTC)
  • Hey, we nominated the Generation IV BF, so I don't see any reason why not this one. ----Desukaan563's userpage has a Value Formula to measure Pokémon worth (talk) 08:44, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
  • Very good article. Very informative and in-detail. -LZ 22:48, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
  • Very informative and the pictures are in high quality. --Golden Chiky 10:55, 16 December 2010 (UTC)
  • Personally, I believe the article looks better when only using the current color as it fits the logo that way. Tempest370 18:11, 17 December 2010 (UTC)
  • I agree with SnorlaxMonster, it should have had more colors, but all in all it's an amazing article and definitely deserving of being a featured article. Eliza 17:49, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
  • The article is amazing and informative. I really don't think extra color is needed it looks nice and neat the way it does now. The pictures have high quality and tons of great tables. This deserves to be a featured article! --Pokemaster97 17:58, 30 December 2010 (UTC)

Object (0)

Other comments