Bulbapedia talk:Shipping: Difference between revisions
From Bulbapedia, the community-driven Pokémon encyclopedia.
Jump to navigationJump to search
Tiddlywinks (talk | contribs) m (Tiddlywinks moved page Bulbapedia talk:Shipping to Bulbapedia talk:Project Shipping/Bulbapedia:Shipping: Just gonna "retire" this) |
m (Maverick Nate moved page Bulbapedia talk:Project Shipping/Bulbapedia:Shipping to Bulbapedia talk:Shipping over a redirect without leaving a redirect: Probably better to just leave it at its original title. The retired policy tags should be enough of an indicator about what's going on) |
(No difference)
| |
Latest revision as of 12:30, 12 May 2023
Notability of most shipping articles
Could someone responsible explain how do these articles comply with Notability requirements, which I'm sure has priority over this policy. Why isn't the Shipping article simply mentioning the canonical AmourShipping and the most predominant non-canonical shippings such as PokéShipping? Why is there need for a forever incomplete list of shippings which have no notability whatsoever?
Shipping, unless canonical and otherwise official or popular enough among fans in general, is not notable by definition. SatoMew 17:49, 4 January 2015 (UTC)
