Bulbapedia talk:Project Moves and Abilities: Difference between revisions
(Glitch attacks?) |
(Leaf Blade) |
||
Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
Should we or should we not give the glitched attacks like TM06 articles? After all, we give the glitched Pokémon like [[Q]] separate articles... Why not the attacks as well? [[User:TTEchidna|Tom Temprotran]] 03:12, 2 January 2007 (UTC) | Should we or should we not give the glitched attacks like TM06 articles? After all, we give the glitched Pokémon like [[Q]] separate articles... Why not the attacks as well? [[User:TTEchidna|Tom Temprotran]] 03:12, 2 January 2007 (UTC) | ||
== Leaf Blade == | |||
{{m|Leaf Blade}} seems to have [http://serebii.net/attackdex-dp/leafblade.shtml gained power] in Diamond/Pearl. |
Revision as of 15:26, 22 January 2007
What goes and what don't
I've just begin to edit some move pages and I was wondering what should go there. For example, a 2nd generation move (like Rain Dance) should have something like "This move didn't exist on 1st generation" under Effect - Generation I?
Also, things like the fact that Stomp will deal double damage on a minimized foe, should be on the Stomp page, the Minimize page or in both?
And finally, moves like Frenzy Plant or Volt Tackle should mention the way you could obtain them (since its uniqueness)?
New member
I would like to join the project as collaborator, who should I ask? Gambler 09:27, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
Glitch attacks?
Should we or should we not give the glitched attacks like TM06 articles? After all, we give the glitched Pokémon like Q separate articles... Why not the attacks as well? Tom Temprotran 03:12, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
Leaf Blade
Leaf Blade seems to have gained power in Diamond/Pearl.