Talk:Smogon

From Bulbapedia, the community-driven Pokémon encyclopedia.
Revision as of 19:56, 6 January 2009 by Marky66 (talk | contribs)
Jump to navigationJump to search

If you guys can get the approval from the majority of the people who contributed to the Wikipedia Smogon article (shouldn't be hard, seeing as they're mainly Smogonites anyway, and the other edits seem to be minor), I wouldn't have any problem removing the Wikipedia tag. Especially since Wikipedia has deleted the Smogon article there anyway. --Archaic 02:49, 13 April 2006 (UTC)

Wikipedia edit history

   * (cur) (last) 15:58, 20 July 2005 Phroziac (vfd)
   * (cur) (last) 15:45, 20 July 2005 Phroziac m (rv vandalism)
   * (cur) (last) 15:42, 20 July 2005 12.65.210.174 (→Administrators)
   * (cur) (last) 15:41, 20 July 2005 Joy Stovall m (Reverted edits by 12.65.210.174 to last version by 70.176.157.162)
   * (cur) (last) 15:39, 20 July 2005 12.65.210.174 (→Administrators)
   * (cur) (last) 15:38, 20 July 2005 12.65.210.174 (→Administrators)
   * (cur) (last) 15:35, 20 July 2005 12.65.210.174 (→Administrators)
   * (cur) (last) 15:35, 20 July 2005 12.65.210.174 (→Administrators)
   * (cur) (last) 15:34, 20 July 2005 12.65.210.174 (→Administrators)
   * (cur) (last) 13:24, 18 July 2005 70.176.157.162
   * (cur) (last) 13:23, 18 July 2005 70.176.157.162 (a few nitpicks and grammar edits)
   * (cur) (last) 12:44, 17 July 2005 Chaos on the internet m
   * (cur) (last) 12:43, 17 July 2005 Chaos on the internet m
   * (cur) (last) 12:42, 17 July 2005 Chaos on the internet m
   * (cur) (last) 08:45, 17 July 2005 Jshadias m
   * (cur) (last) 08:44, 17 July 2005 Jshadias m
   * (cur) (last) 08:43, 17 July 2005 Jshadias m
   * (cur) (last) 08:42, 17 July 2005 Jshadias
   * (cur) (last) 07:54, 17 July 2005 202.155.1.11
   * (cur) (last) 00:59, 17 July 2005 68.9.89.241 (Minor edit)
   * (cur) (last) 15:02, 16 July 2005 Chaos on the internet (IRC server incorrect; added other misc information)
   * (cur) (last) 09:48, 16 July 2005 82.155.8.55
   * (cur) (last) 03:48, 16 July 2005 67.171.28.195
   * (cur) (last) 03:48, 16 July 2005 67.171.28.195
   * (cur) (last) 23:44, 15 July 2005 68.39.165.27
   * (cur) (last) 18:24, 15 July 2005 62.255.32.11 (SPAG, rewording)
   * (cur) (last) 17:51, 15 July 2005 68.65.146.78
   * (cur) (last) 16:55, 15 July 2005 Jshadias m (intend to improve just not right this moment)
   * (cur) (last) 15:30, 15 July 2005 Several Times
   * (cur) (last) 15:29, 15 July 2005 68.65.146.78
   * (cur) (last) 15:27, 15 July 2005 68.65.146.78

Editing this article

Is it just me or does this article sound as if it's a Pine-O-Cleen commercial? Ironically, this article isn't "well-written" as it's saturated with self-promoting, self-evaluating text. Regardless, this note is to just inform you people of my reasons justifying why I have edited the article.

Nazi Mention

Why was it deleted? It's true! Everyone knows that Smogon is Nazi. --Maxim 17:02, 4 December 2008 (UTC)

Before it gets protected

I think the statements about Smogon being a Neo-Nazi and Smogon admins being unfair and abusive should be re-added. This isn't POV, it's reality. --Maxim 19:27, 6 January 2009 (UTC)


Why is this protected? This sounds like it was made by some asshole on the site. I don't see what makes it so notable when you've had so many competitive sites throughout the times. Also, I have how the "source" for this article is Smogon's website itself. Why is THE Alternative being blocked again? Just because you morons haven't heard of it doesn't mean that other people haven't--GGFan

I agree. The page ignores the MOST IMPORTANT FACTS about Smogon卐 That community is run by NEO-NAZIS. It can't be ignored! --Maxim 19:38, 6 January 2009 (UTC)

I agree with GGFan. The site lacks any notability whatsoever and is obviously supported by people who go to Smogon. I've used THE Alternative's analyses before and yet a certain idiot blocked the creation of the site: COSORO

LOL. Using one's own sockpuppets to say "I agree with him" is just ridiculous. --Maxim 19:45, 6 January 2009 (UTC)


ROFL@Accusing the use of sockpuppets. An incredibly idiotic and pathetic tactic on one's part. Anyways GGFan is right.

Marky66