Talk:The Walt Disney Company

Why do we have this? It seems pointless to me. If all it did was temporarily hold the rights to several Pokémon movies, then it is unnotable and should be deleted. - unsigned comment from Spyspotter (talk • contribs) 02:38, 22 June 2013 (UTC)

It was one of the companies that helped to distribute the movies in English, in addition to distributing the anime in the United Kingdom. It does have a connection to the series. --Super goku (talk) 03:29, 22 June 2013 (UTC)

Then why doesn't Boomerang have an article? It currently has airing rights to all Pokémon episodes from the original series. Besides, we don't have an article on Turner Broadcasting Network for running Cartoon Network. - unsigned comment from Spyspotter (talk • contribs) 00:51, 25 June 2013 (UTC)

I would have say that is simply due to the article not being created yet based on the assumption that no one has taken the initiative to create it, but was created once and existed until Cactus merged it with this article. ...So, I guess that It depends on if we should have all stations and corporations as articles, only select stations, or none at all. Though, that might require a decision by the Staff members or a community wide decision. --Super goku (talk) 01:17, 25 June 2013 (UTC)