User talk:Pumpkinking0192/Archive 5: Difference between revisions
From Bulbapedia, the community-driven Pokémon encyclopedia.
Jump to navigationJump to search
ArcToraphim (talk | contribs) m (→Protection) |
Nescientist (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
:::Given that Bulbapedia entirely shuts down non-staff editing at the beginning of every generation so staff can update our pages without interference, I think that ship had sailed a solid decade ago. [[User:Pumpkinking0192|Pumpkinking0192]] ([[User talk:Pumpkinking0192|talk]]) 01:32, 9 September 2016 (UTC) | :::Given that Bulbapedia entirely shuts down non-staff editing at the beginning of every generation so staff can update our pages without interference, I think that ship had sailed a solid decade ago. [[User:Pumpkinking0192|Pumpkinking0192]] ([[User talk:Pumpkinking0192|talk]]) 01:32, 9 September 2016 (UTC) | ||
::::Future note, [http://bulbapedia.bulbagarden.net/wiki/Talk:Refrigerate_(Ability) we don't prefer doing it for ALL prerelease info], just pokémon. You do have to have faith in editors before getting PROTECTPROTECT trigger happy, and I don't agree protecting moves/abilities/people outright should be a thing until real issues arise. Please bear this in mind. [[User:ArcToraphim|Kai]] * the [[User talk:ArcToraphim|Arc]] [[Special:Contributions/ArcToraphim|Toraph]] 01:54, 9 September 2016 (UTC) | ::::Future note, [http://bulbapedia.bulbagarden.net/wiki/Talk:Refrigerate_(Ability) we don't prefer doing it for ALL prerelease info], just pokémon. You do have to have faith in editors before getting PROTECTPROTECT trigger happy, and I don't agree protecting moves/abilities/people outright should be a thing until real issues arise. Please bear this in mind. [[User:ArcToraphim|Kai]] * the [[User talk:ArcToraphim|Arc]] [[Special:Contributions/ArcToraphim|Toraph]] 01:54, 9 September 2016 (UTC) | ||
:::::I can actually understand the non-staff edit lock better; I guess it's really hard to ensure that each of the many edits to move learn levels etc. is actually trustworthy. For prerelease articles, I guess staff (and also you and me) can just spot errors rather easily, then fix them. (And then protect them.) I was interested in your reasoning/opinion, especially seeing you're non-staff. While I agree with ArcToraphim, I at least know what you are (have been) thinking, so thanks again for that. [[User:Nescientist|Nescientist]] ([[User talk:Nescientist|talk]]) 02:10, 9 September 2016 (UTC) | |||
