User talk:Galladeon: Difference between revisions
From Bulbapedia, the community-driven Pokémon encyclopedia.
Jump to navigationJump to search
mNo edit summary |
|||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
Quit adding breaks to those pages! ''[[User:Maverick Nate|<sup style="color:#00008B;">'''Maverick'''</sup>]][[User talk:Maverick Nate|<sub style="color:#00008B;">'''Nate'''</sub>]]'' 12:05, 25 June 2009 (UTC) | Quit adding breaks to those pages! ''[[User:Maverick Nate|<sup style="color:#00008B;">'''Maverick'''</sup>]][[User talk:Maverick Nate|<sub style="color:#00008B;">'''Nate'''</sub>]]'' 12:05, 25 June 2009 (UTC) | ||
:Why? It looks ugly with the overlap! --[[Gallade|<span style="color:#00A000;">'''エ'''</span>]][[User:Galladeon|<span style="color:#0000A0;">'''ルレ'''</span>]][[User talk:Galladeon|<span style="color:#B69E00;">'''イ'''</span><span style="color:#93abc3;">'''ド'''</span>]] 19:59, 25 June 2009 (UTC) | :Why? It looks ugly with the overlap! --[[Gallade|<span style="color:#00A000;">'''エ'''</span>]][[User:Galladeon|<span style="color:#0000A0;">'''ルレ'''</span>]][[User talk:Galladeon|<span style="color:#B69E00;">'''イ'''</span><span style="color:#93abc3;">'''ド'''</span>]] 19:59, 25 June 2009 (UTC) | ||
::Then you're best off getting a new monitor, hopefully one that supports resolutions higher than 640×480 at a recommended setting. Most of the pages you claim "looked bad with the overlap" either didn't overlap at all on a monitor not using dinosaur resolutions like 640×480 or didn't overlap enough to obscure anything. I'm running 800×600, a resolution a lot of recent monitors say is the recommended resolution, and the ''worst'' overlap I saw on those pages was a minor overlap that almost reached the W in Weakness but didn't actually obscure anything. --[[User:Shiningpikablu252|Shiningpikablu252]] 02:46, 26 June 2009 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 02:46, 26 June 2009
TCG pages
Quit adding breaks to those pages! MaverickNate 12:05, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
- Then you're best off getting a new monitor, hopefully one that supports resolutions higher than 640×480 at a recommended setting. Most of the pages you claim "looked bad with the overlap" either didn't overlap at all on a monitor not using dinosaur resolutions like 640×480 or didn't overlap enough to obscure anything. I'm running 800×600, a resolution a lot of recent monitors say is the recommended resolution, and the worst overlap I saw on those pages was a minor overlap that almost reached the W in Weakness but didn't actually obscure anything. --Shiningpikablu252 02:46, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
