Talk:Pokémon Adventures: Difference between revisions
From Bulbapedia, the community-driven Pokémon encyclopedia.
Jump to navigationJump to search
(→Special?: hi) |
|||
| Line 129: | Line 129: | ||
==Special?== | ==Special?== | ||
So if it is always published in English as ''Adventures'', why is it called ''Special'' here all the time? I think you would be hard-pressed to prove that it is called ''Special'' by a majority of readers in English-language regions. -- | So if it is always published in English as ''Adventures'', why is it called ''Special'' here all the time? I think you would be hard-pressed to prove that it is called ''Special'' by a majority of readers in English-language regions. --LaprasBoi 13:42, 4 June 2009 (UTC) | ||
:I agree. Viz is republishing the manga, and despite introducing a new logo and restoring the original Japanese right-to-left format, it's still called Pokémon Adventures. In addition, Red's rival (Oak's grandson) is still called Blue and not Green, while the girl is called Green and not Blue, despite this republishing coming after the release of FireRed and LeafGreen (the former of which had Green as a default name for the rival). --[[User:Evice|Evice]] 23:31, 15 June 2009 (UTC) | :I agree. Viz is republishing the manga, and despite introducing a new logo and restoring the original Japanese right-to-left format, it's still called Pokémon Adventures. In addition, Red's rival (Oak's grandson) is still called Blue and not Green, while the girl is called Green and not Blue, despite this republishing coming after the release of FireRed and LeafGreen (the former of which had Green as a default name for the rival). --[[User:Evice|Evice]] 23:31, 15 June 2009 (UTC) | ||
::It’s nice that someone agrees, but as long as the EiC and the head of the manga project both have a personal bias toward Japanese, I doubt this will go anywhere no matter how illogical the current state of affairs is. Also, I think the argument is meant to be consolidated at [[Talk:Blue (Special)]], I saw an admin point somebody there who began to discuss it somewhere else. --[[User:LaprasBoi|LaprasBoi]] 00:00, 27 June 2009 (UTC) | |||
