Talk:Pokémon LV.X (TCG): Difference between revisions
m (→Replacement: new section) |
|||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
:The TCG, I wouldn't say so. LV.X doesn't indicate a level over 100, it just indicates that the Pokémon is considerably stronger than the card from which it levelled-up (which ''does'' have a designated Level). It's like Pokémon-ex: designed to give the TCG a seriously powerful Pokémon variant. [[User:Cipher|<font style="color:#1874CD;">'''''Cipher'''''</font>]] [[User talk:Cipher|<sup style="color:#003F87;">'''''(Talk)'''''</sup>]] 17:52, 14 January 2009 (UTC) | :The TCG, I wouldn't say so. LV.X doesn't indicate a level over 100, it just indicates that the Pokémon is considerably stronger than the card from which it levelled-up (which ''does'' have a designated Level). It's like Pokémon-ex: designed to give the TCG a seriously powerful Pokémon variant. [[User:Cipher|<font style="color:#1874CD;">'''''Cipher'''''</font>]] [[User talk:Cipher|<sup style="color:#003F87;">'''''(Talk)'''''</sup>]] 17:52, 14 January 2009 (UTC) | ||
== Replacement == | |||
I'd actually argue that the Pokémon LV.X mechanic is only a replacement for Pokémon-ex. Aside from the illustration leaving the box (which doesn't really count), they don't relate to Pokémon Star in any way. I'd argue that they were just phased out until alternate-coloration Pokémon returned in Stormfront. This is why I've removed the part about Pokémon Star being replaced, but if anyone disagrees, feel free to put it back or comment. [[User:Cipher|<font style="color:#1874CD;">'''''Cipher'''''</font>]] [[User talk:Cipher|<small style="color:#003F87;">'''''(Talk)'''''</small>]] 10:29, 26 January 2009 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 10:29, 26 January 2009
Use of table
| <!--Grass--> || <!--Fire--> || <!--Water--> || <!--Lightning--> || <!--Psychic--> || <!--Fighting--> || <!--Darkness--> || <!--Metal--> || <!--Colorless-->
Just slide that in inbetween row breaks. Double Dash 17:21, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
Level X in Roman Numerals
It's just a small point but maybe Nintendo should have considered that X is 10 in Roman numerals. Obviously, Lv.X Pokemon are not on level 10. Bttsstewart 10:03, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
- Unrelated, really. X just indicates a far higher-levelled, far stronger Pokémon than any Pokémon that do have a Level. Cipher (Talk) 11:17, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
So...level off-the scale? Cool! But, Pokemon in the games are forbidden from going above lv100 outside of hacks. Does this mean the TCG and RPG have different 'rules' to follow? Bttsstewart 14:58, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
- The TCG, I wouldn't say so. LV.X doesn't indicate a level over 100, it just indicates that the Pokémon is considerably stronger than the card from which it levelled-up (which does have a designated Level). It's like Pokémon-ex: designed to give the TCG a seriously powerful Pokémon variant. Cipher (Talk) 17:52, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
Replacement
I'd actually argue that the Pokémon LV.X mechanic is only a replacement for Pokémon-ex. Aside from the illustration leaving the box (which doesn't really count), they don't relate to Pokémon Star in any way. I'd argue that they were just phased out until alternate-coloration Pokémon returned in Stormfront. This is why I've removed the part about Pokémon Star being replaced, but if anyone disagrees, feel free to put it back or comment. Cipher (Talk) 10:29, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
