Talk:Cassandra

Parasect

Shouldn't Parasect get its own article as it was a Character of the Day? Turtwig A (talk | contribs) 23:42, 28 December 2009 (UTC)

I'm inclined to agree with this. It got more character development than its trainer and was really the main focus of the episode. Plus, "its only known move was Spore", didn't it use Stun Spore against Pikachu as a Paras? If not, then what other Generation I move can Paras learn that looks like yellow dust? Anyway, I could actually start with the article right now. Missingno. Master wants YOU! Join the Order of the Glitch! (my talk page) 01:58, 29 December 2009 (UTC)

Administration says go ahead. Impress us. ^Maverick_Nate 02:02, 29 December 2009 (UTC)

Starting the article right now. Missingno. Master wants YOU! Join the Order of the Glitch! (my talk page) 02:03, 29 December 2009 (UTC)

And it's done! Missingno. Master wants YOU! Join the Order of the Glitch! (my talk page) 02:46, 29 December 2009 (UTC)

Actually, that could be Spore, as Parasect's Spore was more powerful than normal and Paras had very low confidence at the time. Turtwig A (talk | contribs) 03:17, 29 December 2009 (UTC)

Aaaaannnd, people are already starting to question its notability! Missingno. Master wants YOU! Join the Order of the Glitch! (my talk page) 12:14, 30 December 2009 (UTC)

for anyone reading this after the fact, the article was made, there was a giant argument, and then it was deleted. so in the end, no, Cassandra's Parasect was not notable enough for its own article. -- MAGNEDETH 21:09, 18 January 2010 (UTC)