Talk:Pokémon Gold and Silver beta/Featured article candidate/Nomination 1

From Bulbapedia, the community-driven Pokémon encyclopedia.
Jump to navigationJump to search
The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

Support (8)

  • I liked this article. It was colorful and contained a lot of information. --Clarky 10:06, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
  • I agree. It's a very good article.--RexRacer -talk 15:48, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
  • I like it. A nice historical look at the development and release of GS. At the time, of course, this was all new and novel, so there's a good reason to document it thoroughly. --((Marton imos)) 00:18, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
  • Spr 4d 132.png Aura-Knight 01:24, 12 October 2008 (UTC)
  • Its Totally Awesome.--David Aipom (Talk to me) 15:21, 12 October 2008 (UTC)
  • I liked it, it showed what might've happened in GS and had a lot of informational pictures.--Hey1031 15:57, 12 October 2008 (UTC)
  • Spr 4d 132.png to Martonimos. Alpha Totodile 23:07, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Support. It's a great article, and it shows in some light how the game was planned out to be. ~~Takoto - サソデイ 23:10, 14 April 2009 (UTC)

Object (5)

  • Meh. Seems kind of empty and not detailed to me. Maybe a bit more organization of pics, and I might choose it. ht14 12:40, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
  • I dont think an article about someting that might not even happen should be a featured article--Mooites Talk to me, baby! 16:19, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
What do you mean? Have you even visited it? This is the article talking about the beta, not a possible remake. --RexRacer -talk 16:57, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
  • It's detailed and informative, but personally, I think someone might have overdid the pictures. If you could clean it up a bit more, I'll agree. JirachiWishmaker0802 00:55, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
  • It doesn't seem to have enough substance to really merit being a featured article. It's pretty, but it doesn't reach any standards of greatness. -- evkl (need to talk?) 04:12, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
  • Too flimsy a topic for an FA - not enough substance or attention-grabbing material within. NP Chilla 09:04, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

Other comments

  • I tidied up the article, so it looks more readable. Tell me if you like it or if it looked better before. - Clarky13