Talk:Crustle (Pokémon)
Latest comment: 17 January 2012 by Littlmiget123 in topic Tail?
Mantle?
The "crust" in its name obviously refers to the Earth's crust according to its design, could it be possible that the "le" suffix refers to the mantle? - Swagmander 21:46, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
- Actually, I think 'Crust' is short for 'crustacean' and is combined with 'Castle' because if the large house on it's back. Seems most logical to me. Thetool 07:59, 12 March 2011 (UTC)
- They are both logical enough to me. Both should be part of the name origin section.Virtual-Z 08:13, 12 March 2011 (UTC)
Name translations...
Don't we need to make a special table for Crustle's names in other languages? Such as over here... Haxorus 14:38, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
Speed Trivia
Is it worth mentioning in the trivia section that Crustle has a lower base speed stat than it's pre-evolved form Dwebble? Ssbmelee99 16:14, 7 January 2012 (UTC)
- No. Many Pokemon have one stat lower than their pre-evolution. Werdnae (talk) 00:11, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
Tail?
Does Crustle really have a tail? If so, where is Crustle's hook-like tail shown or mentioned? Littlmiget123 19:12, 12 January 2012 (UTC)
- coughcough* Littlmiget123 04:02, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
- I honestly have no idea, but I say we wait for Crustle to clean or lose its bedrock/shell--SandmanDP 04:05, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
- It's a reasonable assumption. After, it's basically a Dwebble with bigger claws and shell. There's doesn't seem to be any actual proof, however. Perhaps that bit should be removed until there is proof? Crystal Talian 04:16, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
- Here you go~ ★Jo the Marten★ ಠ_ಠ♥ 04:36, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
- Thank you Jo! :D Littlmiget123 02:19, 17 January 2012 (UTC)
- I would never make up such information. Ataro 02:41, 17 January 2012 (UTC)
- I never suggested that you did. I was just simply wondering, as I looked all throughout the article and I didn't see anything stated in the Pokedex entries or in pictures or sprites. ^-^ Littlmiget123 02:50, 17 January 2012 (UTC)
- I would never make up such information. Ataro 02:41, 17 January 2012 (UTC)
- Thank you Jo! :D Littlmiget123 02:19, 17 January 2012 (UTC)
- Here you go~ ★Jo the Marten★ ಠ_ಠ♥ 04:36, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
- It's a reasonable assumption. After, it's basically a Dwebble with bigger claws and shell. There's doesn't seem to be any actual proof, however. Perhaps that bit should be removed until there is proof? Crystal Talian 04:16, 16 January 2012 (UTC)