Talk:Play Rough (move): Difference between revisions
From Bulbapedia, the community-driven Pokémon encyclopedia.
Jump to navigationJump to search
(→Really a variation of Meteor Mash?: new section) |
|||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Its power, accuracy, and BP are the same. But they have different chances of their secondary effect (10% for Play Rough and 20% for {{m|Meteor Mash}}), and it's a different type of effect at that (Play Rough lowers an opponent's stat and Meteor Mash raises a user's stat). I think that makes them just barely too different to be variations, but what does everyone else think? — [[User:Kianglo|<span style="color:#6900CC"><b>KiAN</b></span><span style="color:#AA66FF">GLO</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Kianglo|<span style="color:#00b7eb"><u>TALK</u></span>]]</sup> 05:42, 8 June 2016 (UTC) | Its power, accuracy, and BP are the same. But they have different chances of their secondary effect (10% for Play Rough and 20% for {{m|Meteor Mash}}), and it's a different type of effect at that (Play Rough lowers an opponent's stat and Meteor Mash raises a user's stat). I think that makes them just barely too different to be variations, but what does everyone else think? — [[User:Kianglo|<span style="color:#6900CC"><b>KiAN</b></span><span style="color:#AA66FF">GLO</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Kianglo|<span style="color:#00b7eb"><u>TALK</u></span>]]</sup> 05:42, 8 June 2016 (UTC) | ||
I agree, it shouldn't be considered a variation [[User:Bootyzipperooni|Bootyzipperooni]] ([[User talk:Bootyzipperooni|talk]]) 13:25, 15 December 2016 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 13:25, 15 December 2016
Really a variation of Meteor Mash?
Its power, accuracy, and BP are the same. But they have different chances of their secondary effect (10% for Play Rough and 20% for Meteor Mash), and it's a different type of effect at that (Play Rough lowers an opponent's stat and Meteor Mash raises a user's stat). I think that makes them just barely too different to be variations, but what does everyone else think? — KiANGLO TALK 05:42, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
I agree, it shouldn't be considered a variation Bootyzipperooni (talk) 13:25, 15 December 2016 (UTC)
