Talk:List of Pokémon that appear in every regional Pokédex: Difference between revisions

From Bulbapedia, the community-driven Pokémon encyclopedia.
Jump to navigationJump to search
(Large page...)
No edit summary
Line 20: Line 20:
Since I doubt we're ever going back to Hoenn or Sinnoh like we did with Kanto and will with Johto... why shouldn't we do this? Or something... '''[[User:TTEchidna|<span style="color:#FF0000">''TTE''</span>]][[User talk:TTEchidna|chidna]]''' 00:59, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
Since I doubt we're ever going back to Hoenn or Sinnoh like we did with Kanto and will with Johto... why shouldn't we do this? Or something... '''[[User:TTEchidna|<span style="color:#FF0000">''TTE''</span>]][[User talk:TTEchidna|chidna]]''' 00:59, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
::I understand what you're saying. The only problem is that most of the [[Generation IV]] and [[Generation III]] Pokémon will be all on here... [[User:Ht14|ht14]] 00:31, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
::I understand what you're saying. The only problem is that most of the [[Generation IV]] and [[Generation III]] Pokémon will be all on here... [[User:Ht14|ht14]] 00:31, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
:::Exactly. If we followed the logic of "List of Pokémon that have been in every regional Pokédex since their introduction", which is a mouthful, we'd have several [[Generation III]] Pokémon and all but seven [[Generation IV]] Pokémon. [[User:Gligar|Gli]][[User talk:Gligar|gar]] 01:36, 19 September 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 01:36, 19 September 2008

Platinum extensions?

Well, technically Magnemite and Magneton have been, too...

Maybe a special section for the ones in every regional Dex due to Platinum?

Maybe have it based on "since the generation they were introduced" too? TTEchidna 21:07, 11 September 2008 (UTC)

I think's better to include Magnemite and Magneton too... but pointing that they were absent only in Diamond and Pearl but they ARE present in the Sinnoh Dex. hfc2X 00:13, 12 September 2008 (UTC)

Don't forget the Rhyhorn family. But should their new evolutions be included? - PDL

Pichu and Scizor aren't in the Kanto dex, so no. TTEchidna 22:23, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
Right then... PDL 22:26, 13 September 2008 (UTC)

I just added them, as I saw no reason not to. I just added a small tidbit in a trivia section. Gligar 00:35, 14 September 2008 (UTC)

But as well...

We shouldn't discount something like Crobat completely. Sure, it wasn't in the Kanto Dex, but it has been in every dex since it was introduced.

Since I doubt we're ever going back to Hoenn or Sinnoh like we did with Kanto and will with Johto... why shouldn't we do this? Or something... TTEchidna 00:59, 14 September 2008 (UTC)

I understand what you're saying. The only problem is that most of the Generation IV and Generation III Pokémon will be all on here... ht14 00:31, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
Exactly. If we followed the logic of "List of Pokémon that have been in every regional Pokédex since their introduction", which is a mouthful, we'd have several Generation III Pokémon and all but seven Generation IV Pokémon. Gligar 01:36, 19 September 2008 (UTC)