Talk:Gate: Difference between revisions

From Bulbapedia, the community-driven Pokémon encyclopedia.
Jump to navigationJump to search
(→‎Officer: new section)
Line 7: Line 7:


I think the name "Officer" is out of place, as it refers to the [[Officer|Trainer Class]]. Those are simply "gate guards". And also, I think it should be moved to "Gatehouse". The name "lookout station" is neither official nor popular in fandom. --[[User:Maxim|Maxim]] 16:23, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
I think the name "Officer" is out of place, as it refers to the [[Officer|Trainer Class]]. Those are simply "gate guards". And also, I think it should be moved to "Gatehouse". The name "lookout station" is neither official nor popular in fandom. --[[User:Maxim|Maxim]] 16:23, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
== "edit" near Practical Use ==
The place where it says "edit" for the Practical Use section is located halfway down the paragraph. I do not know why this is, or how this is, or how to fix it. I have refreshed the page several times, so I don't think it just loaded funny. Someone needs to look into it. Perhaps it has something to do with the pictures?--[[User:Lamb|<span style="color:green">Lamb</span>]]<small>''([[User talk:Lamb|<span style="color:brown">talk</span>]])''</small> 07:11, 27 February 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 07:11, 27 February 2010

Pictures of a Generation II lookout station

Can someone please upload pictures of a Generation II guardhouse from both Johto and Kanto? Thank You much --Dialgafan1 00:38, 13 June 2009 (UTC)Dialgafan1

Will do ASAP. TTEchidna 02:15, 13 June 2009 (UTC)

Officer

I think the name "Officer" is out of place, as it refers to the Trainer Class. Those are simply "gate guards". And also, I think it should be moved to "Gatehouse". The name "lookout station" is neither official nor popular in fandom. --Maxim 16:23, 3 July 2009 (UTC)

"edit" near Practical Use

The place where it says "edit" for the Practical Use section is located halfway down the paragraph. I do not know why this is, or how this is, or how to fix it. I have refreshed the page several times, so I don't think it just loaded funny. Someone needs to look into it. Perhaps it has something to do with the pictures?--Lamb(talk) 07:11, 27 February 2010 (UTC)