Talk:Chief: Difference between revisions

From Bulbapedia, the community-driven Pokémon encyclopedia.
Jump to navigationJump to search
(that's what you meant right?)
Line 12: Line 12:
::::::I agree with the deletion of this page (or at least redirecting). [[User:CuboneKing|<font color="Red">Cu</font>]][[User talk:CuboneKing|<font color="Tan">bo</font>]][[Special:Contributions/CuboneKing|<font color="Green color light">ne</font>]][[Cubone (Pokémon)|<font color="Black">King</font>]] 18:24, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
::::::I agree with the deletion of this page (or at least redirecting). [[User:CuboneKing|<font color="Red">Cu</font>]][[User talk:CuboneKing|<font color="Tan">bo</font>]][[Special:Contributions/CuboneKing|<font color="Green color light">ne</font>]][[Cubone (Pokémon)|<font color="Black">King</font>]] 18:24, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
:::::::@SpecialK Do you mean the Pokémon Jacred has, because isn't it a glitch Trainer, not a glitch Pokémon? --[[User:SnorlaxMonster|<span style="color:#A70000">'''Snorlax'''</span>]][[User talk:SnorlaxMonster|<span style="color:#0000A7">'''Monster'''</span>]] 06:24, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
:::::::@SpecialK Do you mean the Pokémon Jacred has, because isn't it a glitch Trainer, not a glitch Pokémon? --[[User:SnorlaxMonster|<span style="color:#A70000">'''Snorlax'''</span>]][[User talk:SnorlaxMonster|<span style="color:#0000A7">'''Monster'''</span>]] 06:24, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
::::::::No i mean I caught one as a glitch Pkmn once. As above↑

Revision as of 15:56, 9 February 2010

What is going on???? This is madness. Why delete? I mean, give me 3 good reasons! SpecialK Leiks Lucario and The Celebi Glitch 13:12, 7 February 2010 (UTC)

Because this information is on the Glitch Trainer article now. Just like it says in the deletion template. -Sketch 13:17, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
I'm not stupid, i looked there. But it was better as this seperate article!! SpecialK Leiks Lucario and The Celebi Glitch 13:20, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
  1. It has all of its information on another page.
  2. It is a stub.
  3. It is not very notable.

There are your 3 good reasons. --SnorlaxMonster 13:22, 7 February 2010 (UTC)

Chief isn't a glitch. It's a beta Trainer Class actually. I'd prefer to keep it. all those PBR Trainer Classes are also eternal stubs. --Maxim 13:25, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
Not notable. Seriously. I caught one once, (forgotten how :~() and most GLITCH Pokémon have there own pages, so this one should. PS i agree with Maxim, all PBR trainers are stubs! SpecialK Leiks Lucario and The Celebi Glitch 13:27, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
It is a beta trainer class, so maybe it should stay. As for PBR trainer classes, if it has all possible information and is still a stub, maybe a list is needed, like how many items have received. However, Jacred is a glitch and should be deleted as it has been merged. --SnorlaxMonster 13:34, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
Yeah. I agree with deleting Jacred. Can someone investigate the "catching side of it? It has the same back sprite as charmander and has the moveset of a Wartortle, but with Super Glitch at level, hmmm, can't remember. SpecialK Leiks Lucario and The Celebi Glitch 13:40, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
I agree with the deletion of this page (or at least redirecting). CuboneKing 18:24, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
@SpecialK Do you mean the Pokémon Jacred has, because isn't it a glitch Trainer, not a glitch Pokémon? --SnorlaxMonster 06:24, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
No i mean I caught one as a glitch Pkmn once. As above↑