Bulbapedia talk:Blocking policy: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
It should be fairly easy to appeal the ban on BMGf as well anyway, especially with that allowing for posting by unregged users, unlike 'pedia. --[[User:Archaic|Archaic]] 06:14, 13 January 2006 (CST) | It should be fairly easy to appeal the ban on BMGf as well anyway, especially with that allowing for posting by unregged users, unlike 'pedia. --[[User:Archaic|Archaic]] 06:14, 13 January 2006 (CST) | ||
You should be able to edit your tpage anyway, even if blocked. | You should be able to edit your tpage anyway, even if blocked.--[[User:Tmwps|Tmwps]] 17:27, 9 April 2009 (UTC) | ||
==Regarding the point on [[Bulbapedia:Blocking_policy#Uncivil behavior|uncivil behavior]]== | ==Regarding the point on [[Bulbapedia:Blocking_policy#Uncivil behavior|uncivil behavior]]== | ||
Is it okay to use abusive language under the proviso that it is not offensive to anyone?--[[User:Tmwps|Tmwps]] 17:12, 9 April 2009 (UTC) | Is it okay to use abusive language under the proviso that it is not offensive to anyone?--[[User:Tmwps|Tmwps]] 17:12, 9 April 2009 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 17:27, 9 April 2009
Blocking administrators should be required to have registered e-mail addresses
I think that any administrator who blocks a user, for any reason, should have his/her e-mail address on the Bulbapedia system, to allow the blocked user to e-mail the administrator and ask for more details for the reason of the blocking. User142 | Talk 05:24, 12 January 2006 (CST)
The block log is visible to all, and I think a blocked user will see the reason they are blocked when they try to edit pages. In any case, as per current policy, appeals go to the Editor-in-Chief. - 振霖T 02:54, 13 January 2006 (CST)
It should be fairly easy to appeal the ban on BMGf as well anyway, especially with that allowing for posting by unregged users, unlike 'pedia. --Archaic 06:14, 13 January 2006 (CST)
You should be able to edit your tpage anyway, even if blocked.--Tmwps 17:27, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
Regarding the point on uncivil behavior
Is it okay to use abusive language under the proviso that it is not offensive to anyone?--Tmwps 17:12, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
