Talk:Pokémon Crater/Featured article candidate: Difference between revisions
From Bulbapedia, the community-driven Pokémon encyclopedia.
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
m (→Object (7)) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
* I was a member, and, though there was a more recent logo, it was overall a good article--[[User:Kuki|<span style="color:#b00000;">Kuki</span>]][[User talk:Kuki|<span style="color:#2c40a4;">Ta</span><span style="color:#049440;">lk</span>]] 12:26, 2 August 2008 (UTC) | * I was a member, and, though there was a more recent logo, it was overall a good article--[[User:Kuki|<span style="color:#b00000;">Kuki</span>]][[User talk:Kuki|<span style="color:#2c40a4;">Ta</span><span style="color:#049440;">lk</span>]] 12:26, 2 August 2008 (UTC) | ||
====Object ( | ====Object (7)==== | ||
* I don't think this article should get featured... Even if we put aside the fact that it's about a fan-game with fan-Pokémon (and that's a really big ''if''), it's just not that good. Definitely not close to the articles we already have featured. --[[User:ElectAbuzzzz|electAbuzzzz]] <sup>([[User talk:ElectAbuzzzz|TALK]])</sup> 12:45, 2 August 2008 (UTC) | * I don't think this article should get featured... Even if we put aside the fact that it's about a fan-game with fan-Pokémon (and that's a really big ''if''), it's just not that good. Definitely not close to the articles we already have featured. --[[User:ElectAbuzzzz|electAbuzzzz]] <sup>([[User talk:ElectAbuzzzz|TALK]])</sup> 12:45, 2 August 2008 (UTC) | ||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
*Fansite = No nomination. --[[Tracey Sketchit|<span style="color:#33CC66;">'''ケンジ'''</span>]][[User talk:Kenji-girl|<span style="color:#6600CC;">'''の'''</span>]][[User:Kenji-girl|<span style="color:#FF00CC;">'''ガール'''</span>]] 07:34, 13 August 2008 (UTC) | *Fansite = No nomination. --[[Tracey Sketchit|<span style="color:#33CC66;">'''ケンジ'''</span>]][[User talk:Kenji-girl|<span style="color:#6600CC;">'''の'''</span>]][[User:Kenji-girl|<span style="color:#FF00CC;">'''ガール'''</span>]] 07:34, 13 August 2008 (UTC) | ||
*I honestly didn't know that we had a page for the site, and don't think we even should. It's a fansite, and the guy who ran it ''quit''. [[User:Theininen|<span style="color:#008000;">The<span style="color:#0000CD;">in</span></span>]][[User talk:Theininen|<span style="color:#B22222;">in<span style="color:#ED9121;">en</span></span>]] 21:42, 14 August 2008 (UTC) | *I honestly didn't know that we had a page for the site, and don't think we even should. It's a fansite, and the guy who ran it ''quit''. [[User:Theininen|<span style="color:#008000;">The<span style="color:#0000CD;">in</span></span>]][[User talk:Theininen|<span style="color:#B22222;">in<span style="color:#ED9121;">en</span></span>]] 21:42, 14 August 2008 (UTC) | ||
*It's a ''good article'', especially for a fan-gamesite, but I don't think it's good enough, or important enough to be named a '''Featured Article''' - [[User:Kogoro|<span style="color:#DA70D6;">'''Kogoro'''</span>]] '''|''' [[User talk:Kogoro|<span style="color:#FFB6C1;">'''Talk to me'''</span>]] '''|''' 01:55, 30 September 2008 (UTC) | |||
====Other comments==== | ====Other comments==== | ||
Is there any rule that fansites can't be featured articles? I don't think so.--'''[[User:Misty-may-dawn rulz|<span style="color:#ED9121">Misty</span>-<span style="color:#CC0000">May</span>-<span style="color:#0000CC">Dawn</span>]] [[User talk:Misty-may-dawn rulz|<span style="color:#00CC00">rulz</span>]]''' 10:03, 25 August 2008 (UTC) | Is there any rule that fansites can't be featured articles? I don't think so.--'''[[User:Misty-may-dawn rulz|<span style="color:#ED9121">Misty</span>-<span style="color:#CC0000">May</span>-<span style="color:#0000CC">Dawn</span>]] [[User talk:Misty-may-dawn rulz|<span style="color:#00CC00">rulz</span>]]''' 10:03, 25 August 2008 (UTC) | ||
:It's common sense. If an article is featured, it should be about a big and important subject in the franchise. Take the current featured articles, and even the other nominees, as examples. Do we want a ''fan site'' with ''fakes'' on our front page? --[[User:ElectAbuzzzz|electAbuzzzz]] <sup>([[User talk:ElectAbuzzzz|TALK]])</sup> 10:15, 25 August 2008 (UTC) | :It's common sense. If an article is featured, it should be about a big and important subject in the franchise. Take the current featured articles, and even the other nominees, as examples. Do we want a ''fan site'' with ''fakes'' on our front page? --[[User:ElectAbuzzzz|electAbuzzzz]] <sup>([[User talk:ElectAbuzzzz|TALK]])</sup> 10:15, 25 August 2008 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 01:55, 30 September 2008
Support (2)
- It's a good article.--Misty-May-Dawn rulz 12:21, 2 August 2008 (UTC)
- I was a member, and, though there was a more recent logo, it was overall a good article--KukiTalk 12:26, 2 August 2008 (UTC)
Object (7)
- I don't think this article should get featured... Even if we put aside the fact that it's about a fan-game with fan-Pokémon (and that's a really big if), it's just not that good. Definitely not close to the articles we already have featured. --electAbuzzzz (TALK) 12:45, 2 August 2008 (UTC)
- It's a frickin' fan site. --ニョロトノ666 21:18, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
- concur with the aboveDCM
- Yeah. --Martonimos((Argh|Blargh)) 23:42, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
- Fansite = No nomination. --ケンジのガール 07:34, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
- I honestly didn't know that we had a page for the site, and don't think we even should. It's a fansite, and the guy who ran it quit. Theininen 21:42, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
- It's a good article, especially for a fan-gamesite, but I don't think it's good enough, or important enough to be named a Featured Article - Kogoro | Talk to me | 01:55, 30 September 2008 (UTC)
Other comments
Is there any rule that fansites can't be featured articles? I don't think so.--Misty-May-Dawn rulz 10:03, 25 August 2008 (UTC)
- It's common sense. If an article is featured, it should be about a big and important subject in the franchise. Take the current featured articles, and even the other nominees, as examples. Do we want a fan site with fakes on our front page? --electAbuzzzz (TALK) 10:15, 25 August 2008 (UTC)
