Talk:List of glitch types in Generation I: Difference between revisions
From Bulbapedia, the community-driven Pokémon encyclopedia.
Jump to navigationJump to search
m (→Type effectiveness: reply) |
m (→Pre-merge discussions: look, another one) |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
* [[Talk:Bird (type)]] | * [[Talk:Bird (type)]] | ||
* [[Talk:Pokémaniac (type)]] | * [[Talk:Pokémaniac (type)]] | ||
* [[Talk:CoolTrainer♀ (type)]] | |||
==Type effectiveness== | ==Type effectiveness== | ||
Revision as of 07:08, 28 October 2009
Pre-merge discussions
Type effectiveness
Considering all glitch moves will have neutral type effectiveness, is it really necessary to use
| Offensive | 
|
Defensive | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | Types | Power | Types | |
| 2× | None | ½× | None | |
| ½× | None | 2× | None | |
| 0× | None | 0× | None | |
--SnorlaxMonster 11:33, 26 October 2009 (UTC)
- Pictorial representation. It makes it easier to see these things. It's also how things get done on the standard types pages. —darklordtrom 23:22, 26 October 2009 (UTC)
- Well yes, but because they are all the same with no strengths and no weakesses, couldn't we just have 1 for all of the types?--SnorlaxMonster 02:44, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
- It's still best to do things individually. —darklordtrom 02:56, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
- Well yes, but because they are all the same with no strengths and no weakesses, couldn't we just have 1 for all of the types?--SnorlaxMonster 02:44, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
