Template talk:ItemInfobox/head: Difference between revisions
From Bulbapedia, the community-driven Pokémon encyclopedia.
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{mainspace|template}} | {{mainspace|template|status=complete}} | ||
==Comments== | ==Comments== | ||
IIRC the rest of the site generally lists chronologically, not reverse-chronologically. Therefore your item listings going from the most recent generation to the first seems odd. I understand why you've done it that way (or at least I can make a case for it) but I think that with the way everything else is set up, people looking for the most recent information will automatically scan to the bottom of the table. —'''<span style="font-family:Verdana"><span style="color:#000">darklord</span>[[User talk:The dark lord trombonator|<span style="color:#0047AB">trom</span>]]</span>''' 10:31, 22 February 2013 (UTC) | IIRC the rest of the site generally lists chronologically, not reverse-chronologically. Therefore your item listings going from the most recent generation to the first seems odd. I understand why you've done it that way (or at least I can make a case for it) but I think that with the way everything else is set up, people looking for the most recent information will automatically scan to the bottom of the table. —'''<span style="font-family:Verdana"><span style="color:#000">darklord</span>[[User talk:The dark lord trombonator|<span style="color:#0047AB">trom</span>]]</span>''' 10:31, 22 February 2013 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 09:13, 14 November 2015
|
This template is intended to be moved into one of Bulbapedia's main content spaces. Be mindful that it is still part of a personal userspace. Any content changes should be brought up on the talk page for this template. |
Comments
IIRC the rest of the site generally lists chronologically, not reverse-chronologically. Therefore your item listings going from the most recent generation to the first seems odd. I understand why you've done it that way (or at least I can make a case for it) but I think that with the way everything else is set up, people looking for the most recent information will automatically scan to the bottom of the table. —darklordtrom 10:31, 22 February 2013 (UTC)
- Oh, I only just noticed this comment. I suppose that is a good point; the rest of the page is sorted chronologically as well (with item descriptions and item locations). I think I will flip it. --SnorlaxMonster 13:27, 23 April 2013 (UTC)
Mainspacing the articles
If the only thing preventing it is the mainspacing of the template itself, then perhaps it would be better to move the articles without it. SatoMew 18:17, 24 December 2014 (UTC)
