Talk:Baby Pokémon: Difference between revisions
From Bulbapedia, the community-driven Pokémon encyclopedia.
Jump to navigationJump to search
(→Togepi) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
Well, that's exactly why I added that note on the bottom. But if you compare other babies to Togepi, the only thing it's messing is an old evolution. It's not a pre-evolution, but it is a baby. - [[User:Ferret|Ferret]] 20:42, 27 Feb 2005 (UTC) | Well, that's exactly why I added that note on the bottom. But if you compare other babies to Togepi, the only thing it's messing is an old evolution. It's not a pre-evolution, but it is a baby. - [[User:Ferret|Ferret]] 20:42, 27 Feb 2005 (UTC) | ||
:Same could be said about {{p|Riolu}}, as it's obtained in a similar way to Togepi in DP. [[User:TTEchidna|Tom Temprotran]] 03:35, 25 November 2006 (UTC) | :Same could be said about {{p|Riolu}}, as it's obtained in a similar way to Togepi in DP. [[User:TTEchidna|Tom Temprotran]] 03:35, 25 November 2006 (UTC) | ||
:: Well, Togepi is a Baby Pokemon as of Generation IV because of it's final evolution... if you catch my drift [[User:Tesh|Tesh]] 21:13, 26 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 21:13, 26 July 2007
Togepi
Is Togepi a baby? I've never heard that before...Although it makes sense. Anyone wanna verify? The only "baby" PKMN I knew of were the pre-evos of preexisting pogeys.
Well, that's exactly why I added that note on the bottom. But if you compare other babies to Togepi, the only thing it's messing is an old evolution. It's not a pre-evolution, but it is a baby. - Ferret 20:42, 27 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- Same could be said about Riolu, as it's obtained in a similar way to Togepi in DP. Tom Temprotran 03:35, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
- Well, Togepi is a Baby Pokemon as of Generation IV because of it's final evolution... if you catch my drift Tesh 21:13, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
