User talk:Venomoth

Archives viewable here

Creating pages and templates

Hi Venomoth. When you next create a page or a template, be sure to categorise it so that it can be found later and doesn't end up here. With that said, your recent contribution Template:Pkm was not required. The word Pokémon isn't terribly hard to write using alt-codes (e.g. Alt+130) or the character palette below the screen. It encourages laziness and has been deleted now. —darklordtrom 02:16, 4 October 2010 (UTC)

Laziness? That's the point of templates: To provide a shortcut. I don't think it should be deleted, although I did create it before I noticed the "Poké" in the Character palette of editing pages. Thanks for the nomination! ...I think. =$ --☯ *Ɣℯ№ӎօṫհ* ☯ 06:23, 4 October 2010 (UTC)

Kenhorou

...is not a branched evolution, so it should not be treated as such. It evolves into the same Pokemon, it just has a (significant) gender difference. 梅子^❀_✿ 01:49, 26 October 2010 (UTC)

It still needs to be added, in all cases of Pokémon with form differences, such as Meloetta, Rotom and Shellos we always include those in the evolution. I guess when we get a infobox image of the female we can have the page alternate like on the rest of the of them. --☯ *Ɣℯ№ӎօṫհ* ☯ 01:57, 26 October 2010 (UTC)

Except it's a gender difference, not a form difference. Please refrain from adding it back to the article. 梅子^❀_✿ 02:05, 26 October 2010 (UTC)

If we do Kenhorou then we have to do these guys too. It's silly to do one gender and not the others just because it's more noticeable. --ケンジのガール 02:07, 26 October 2010 (UTC)

By the way, that is not an invitation to add branched evolutions to Venusaur's page and such. 梅子^❀_✿ 02:09, 26 October 2010 (UTC)