User talk:Venomoth: Difference between revisions

From Bulbapedia, the community-driven Pokémon encyclopedia.
Jump to navigationJump to search
(still must be included)
Line 9: Line 9:


...is not a branched evolution, so it should not be treated as such.  It evolves into the same Pokemon, it just has a (significant) gender difference. <span style="border: 2px dotted #FFBBDD;">[[User:Umeko|<span style="color:#FF99CC;">梅子</span>]][[User talk:Umeko|<span style="color:#FF99CC;"><sup>❀</sup></span>]][[Special:Contributions/Umeko|<span style="color:#FF99CC;"><sub>✿</sub></span>]]</span> 01:49, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
...is not a branched evolution, so it should not be treated as such.  It evolves into the same Pokemon, it just has a (significant) gender difference. <span style="border: 2px dotted #FFBBDD;">[[User:Umeko|<span style="color:#FF99CC;">梅子</span>]][[User talk:Umeko|<span style="color:#FF99CC;"><sup>❀</sup></span>]][[Special:Contributions/Umeko|<span style="color:#FF99CC;"><sub>✿</sub></span>]]</span> 01:49, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
:It still needs to be added, in all cases of Pokémon with [[form differences]], such as {{p|Meloetta}}, {{p|Rotom}} and {{p|Shellos}} we always include those in the evolution. --[[User talk:Venomoth|☯ ]][[User:Venomoth|*Ɣℯ№ӎօṫհ*]][[User talk:Venomoth| ☯]] 01:57, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
:It still needs to be added, in all cases of Pokémon with [[form differences]], such as {{p|Meloetta}}, {{p|Rotom}} and {{p|Shellos}} we always include those in the evolution. I guess when we get a infobox image of the female we can have the page alternate like on the rest of the of them. --[[User talk:Venomoth|☯ ]][[User:Venomoth|*Ɣℯ№ӎօṫհ*]][[User talk:Venomoth| ☯]] 01:57, 26 October 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 01:58, 26 October 2010

Archives viewable here

Creating pages and templates

Hi Venomoth. When you next create a page or a template, be sure to categorise it so that it can be found later and doesn't end up here. With that said, your recent contribution Template:Pkm was not required. The word Pokémon isn't terribly hard to write using alt-codes (e.g. Alt+130) or the character palette below the screen. It encourages laziness and has been deleted now. —darklordtrom 02:16, 4 October 2010 (UTC)

Laziness? That's the point of templates: To provide a shortcut. I don't think it should be deleted, although I did create it before I noticed the "Poké" in the Character palette of editing pages. Thanks for the nomination! ...I think. =$ --*Ɣℯ№ӎօṫհ* 06:23, 4 October 2010 (UTC)

Kenhorou

...is not a branched evolution, so it should not be treated as such. It evolves into the same Pokemon, it just has a (significant) gender difference. 梅子 01:49, 26 October 2010 (UTC)

It still needs to be added, in all cases of Pokémon with form differences, such as Meloetta, Rotom and Shellos we always include those in the evolution. I guess when we get a infobox image of the female we can have the page alternate like on the rest of the of them. --*Ɣℯ№ӎօṫհ* 01:57, 26 October 2010 (UTC)