The Pokémon: Symphonic Evolutions concert tour is coming to Washington, D.C. on August 15th and Philadelphia on September 19th. Seats are limited, so be sure to book your tickets quick!
Pokémon Omega Ruby and Alpha Sapphire have been announced!
Check BNN and Bulbanews for up-to-date Pokémon news and discuss it on the forums or in our IRC channel.

Template talk:PokéWalkerarea/f

From Bulbapedia, the community-driven Pokémon encyclopedia.
Jump to: navigation, search

advantageous type effects

This is something that I just threw together real fast as an example, but can we add something like this to the end of this template and then I'll add in all of the values for it? I really want it to be less wordy, but this was the best I could do :/ ... Does this seem like it will visually work, or should we try a different approach? Each PokéWalker course article would look something like what Refreshing Field (PokéWalker area) looks like right now except removing "Advantageous type:" from the text. How can we make this better? Any suggestions? (Yaminokame 17:31, 25 November 2009 (UTC))


Group Pokémon Level Steps Required Rarity Held Item Moves
 ? Spr 4h 025 m.png
Pikachu
Level
??
??? steps Unknown Unknown -- --
-- --
-- --
-- --
*Required steps with advantageous types.

I think it looks a bit odd... but, I don't know what to do to make it better. Is there some kind of precedent for this, or are we gonna have to tinker 'till it looks right? Oh, where would the second set go? --Oz 17:37, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
I'm hoping that Tc26 will be able to figure something out like they usually do ^^ It looks really forced right now and I don't know what would make it better... it might just be better overall to just say screw the whole thing and not do it though :/ ... the second set would be the scroll-over ones. For example, it would say "2000+ steps" (right now it says "2000+ steps") and then the note at the bottom would tell the reader that the scroll-over value is when advantage types are factored in :/ ... I just can't make it look right ;__; (Yaminokame 17:44, 25 November 2009 (UTC))
How about that? If you don't like it, just revert it back. Let's throw some stuff around. --Oz 17:54, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
I'd say it's an improvement :) Let's just give it a day or so and if no one objects then we should change it... then more people will notice once it's changed and then fix it up if they feel it needs it :p It is better though haha (Yaminokame 23:29, 25 November 2009 (UTC))
So, which one did we end up with, or are we still trying to work out the optimal one? --Oz 17:12, 29 November 2009 (UTC)