User talk:Nescientist/Project Trace: Difference between revisions

From Bulbapedia, the community-driven Pokémon encyclopedia.
Jump to navigationJump to search
(Created page with "==Template format== A couple issues that arose previously with {{template|User:TehPerson/learnlist/prevgen8}} that I realized no one ever thought to communicate: * The Generat...")
 
Line 12: Line 12:


[[User:Tiddlywinks|Tiddlywinks]] ([[User talk:Tiddlywinks|talk]]) 00:34, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
[[User:Tiddlywinks|Tiddlywinks]] ([[User talk:Tiddlywinks|talk]]) 00:34, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
:I know the questions were not directed to me, but I think I can add a thing or two. For generations I to III, I believe the idea is to keep the pattern we already have at the learnset subpages for these generations, without putting the damage category. We also would only have to consider this when transferring from gen I to II or from gen II to I, as you can never transfer ''to'' gen III.
:About checkmarks vs generation numbers, I have a preference for the generation numbers. They are at least just as easy to read, and they follow the same idea we have for listing game abbreviations in move tutor learnsets. And personally, I also think they look more interesting than plain checkmarks, but that's just me.
:Another unrelated thing: we should probably have a small list of related talk page sections and user subpages linked in the project page. [[User:Suic12-|Suic]] ([[User talk:Suic12-|talk]]) 01:27, 8 July 2020 (UTC)

Revision as of 01:27, 8 July 2020

Template format

A couple issues that arose previously with {{User:TehPerson/learnlist/prevgen8}} that I realized no one ever thought to communicate:

  • The Generation columns are bolded twice over. Once with the header ! and once with '''.
  • The links to the past learnset subsections are probably not needed. They could even be confusing if a Pokemon learns a move in more than one way. If people can just get to the page, they can search it themselves.
  • Also, the sorting has a couple issues. First off, the numbers just don't sort right. Second, for Pokemon like the Alolan examples, it doesn't work at all. This is probably due to hiding some of the Generation columns, a problem I've had in the past. (I believe the page just thinks the sort button for the second column applies to the second column it has data for, even if it's hidden.) That's one reason it's better to just "erase" the column/cell entirely if you can.

There was also a suggestion that the Generation columns could just be turned into checkmarks ({{yes}}). The column "header" could link to the page instead.

Also, I'll note that #ifexpr is generally a parser we want to avoid using a lot. It'd probably be fine for the past pages, but on the main species page, it could potentially be a problem.

I'm also curious: when you're doing Gen III transfers, how are you going to deal with the fact that individual moves don't actually have a physical/special attribute? Just use the one appropriate to the type and call it good?

Tiddlywinks (talk) 00:34, 8 July 2020 (UTC)

I know the questions were not directed to me, but I think I can add a thing or two. For generations I to III, I believe the idea is to keep the pattern we already have at the learnset subpages for these generations, without putting the damage category. We also would only have to consider this when transferring from gen I to II or from gen II to I, as you can never transfer to gen III.
About checkmarks vs generation numbers, I have a preference for the generation numbers. They are at least just as easy to read, and they follow the same idea we have for listing game abbreviations in move tutor learnsets. And personally, I also think they look more interesting than plain checkmarks, but that's just me.
Another unrelated thing: we should probably have a small list of related talk page sections and user subpages linked in the project page. Suic (talk) 01:27, 8 July 2020 (UTC)