Template talk:ItemInfobox/head: Difference between revisions
From Bulbapedia, the community-driven Pokémon encyclopedia.
Jump to navigationJump to search
(Created page with "==Comments== IIRC the rest of the site generally lists chronologically, not reverse-chronologically. Therefore your item listings going from the most recent generation to the ...") |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Comments== | ==Comments== | ||
IIRC the rest of the site generally lists chronologically, not reverse-chronologically. Therefore your item listings going from the most recent generation to the first seems odd. I understand why you've done it that way (or at least I can make a case for it) but I think that with the way everything else is set up, people looking for the most recent information will automatically scan to the bottom of the table. —'''<span style="font-family:Verdana"><span style="color:#000">darklord</span>[[User talk:The dark lord trombonator|<span style="color:#0047AB">trom</span>]]</span>''' 10:31, 22 February 2013 (UTC) | IIRC the rest of the site generally lists chronologically, not reverse-chronologically. Therefore your item listings going from the most recent generation to the first seems odd. I understand why you've done it that way (or at least I can make a case for it) but I think that with the way everything else is set up, people looking for the most recent information will automatically scan to the bottom of the table. —'''<span style="font-family:Verdana"><span style="color:#000">darklord</span>[[User talk:The dark lord trombonator|<span style="color:#0047AB">trom</span>]]</span>''' 10:31, 22 February 2013 (UTC) | ||
:Oh, I only just noticed this comment. I suppose that is a good point; the rest of the page is sorted chronologically as well (with item descriptions and item locations). I think I will flip it. --[[User:SnorlaxMonster|<span style="color:#A70000">'''Snorlax'''</span>]][[User talk:SnorlaxMonster|<span style="color:#0000A7">'''Monster'''</span>]] 13:27, 23 April 2013 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 13:27, 23 April 2013
Comments
IIRC the rest of the site generally lists chronologically, not reverse-chronologically. Therefore your item listings going from the most recent generation to the first seems odd. I understand why you've done it that way (or at least I can make a case for it) but I think that with the way everything else is set up, people looking for the most recent information will automatically scan to the bottom of the table. —darklordtrom 10:31, 22 February 2013 (UTC)
