Talk:Seviper (Pokémon): Difference between revisions
From Bulbapedia, the community-driven Pokémon encyclopedia.
Jump to navigationJump to search
Tavisource (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
::About the "what-we-see-is-true basis"...but we also never saw that Arbok CANNOT evolve into Seviper, so we can't conclude that the Trainer's Choice was a mistake.--[[Bulbapedia:Project Custom Sprite|<font color="brown"><small><sup>☆</sup></small></font>]][[User:Tavisource|<font color="teal">Tavis</font>]][[User talk:Tavisource|<font color="gray"><small>ource</small></font>]] 23:44, 15 July 2009 (UTC) | ::About the "what-we-see-is-true basis"...but we also never saw that Arbok CANNOT evolve into Seviper, so we can't conclude that the Trainer's Choice was a mistake.--[[Bulbapedia:Project Custom Sprite|<font color="brown"><small><sup>☆</sup></small></font>]][[User:Tavisource|<font color="teal">Tavis</font>]][[User talk:Tavisource|<font color="gray"><small>ource</small></font>]] 23:44, 15 July 2009 (UTC) | ||
:::We never saw half the Pokémon evolve into their evolutions; should we go around editing their Trivia sections stating "X may not evolve from Y in the anime because it was never seen"? I think not. —'''<span style="font-family:Verdana"><span style="color:#000">darklord</span>[[User talk:The dark lord trombonator|<span style="color:#0047AB">trom</span>]]</span>''' 23:47, 15 July 2009 (UTC) | :::We never saw half the Pokémon evolve into their evolutions; should we go around editing their Trivia sections stating "X may not evolve from Y in the anime because it was never seen"? I think not. —'''<span style="font-family:Verdana"><span style="color:#000">darklord</span>[[User talk:The dark lord trombonator|<span style="color:#0047AB">trom</span>]]</span>''' 23:47, 15 July 2009 (UTC) | ||
::::No, but their evolutions are proven in the game.--[[Bulbapedia:Project Custom Sprite|<font color="brown"><small><sup>☆</sup></small></font>]][[User:Tavisource|<font color="teal">Tavis</font>]][[User talk:Tavisource|<font color="gray"><small>ource</small></font>]] 00:50, 16 July 2009 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 00:50, 16 July 2009
Learnset
Why hasn't a learn set been added for this article yet?
Tutoring!
look at the section.I dont know how to fix that--DCM((TalkContributions))
- many other Pokémon articles, not only Seviper is facing the same problem. see Golduck and also, see Talk:Golduck (Pokémon).--Diby 12:07, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
Arbok -> Seviper?
Could the Trainer's Choice possibly NOT be a mistake. Because it was never proven that it's not possible for Arboks to evolve into Sevipers. Because there is no prove, the mistake is not a mistake, but simply another piece of "possibly-true" evidence. Right? And like in other cases such as the reason why we can't conclude that Ash's Grotle has Overgrow, this is similar. It's both because there is a possibility that it could happen and there was not prove to counter it otherwise. What do you guys think?--☆Tavisource 23:35, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
- The anime works on a what-we-see-is-true basis. We see Grotle with no ability; we write "Unknown". We don't see Arbok evolving into Seviper, so we don't put that in either. The writers aren't stupid enough to make Jessie release her strongest Pokémon, only to catch its evolution. Besides, the anime is based on the underlying and overruling concept of the game. Sure, there are a couple of variations, but something this huge doesn't fly here. —darklordtrom 23:38, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
- About the "what-we-see-is-true basis"...but we also never saw that Arbok CANNOT evolve into Seviper, so we can't conclude that the Trainer's Choice was a mistake.--☆Tavisource 23:44, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
- We never saw half the Pokémon evolve into their evolutions; should we go around editing their Trivia sections stating "X may not evolve from Y in the anime because it was never seen"? I think not. —darklordtrom 23:47, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
- About the "what-we-see-is-true basis"...but we also never saw that Arbok CANNOT evolve into Seviper, so we can't conclude that the Trainer's Choice was a mistake.--☆Tavisource 23:44, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
