Talk:Normal (type): Difference between revisions
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
Lol. But seriously, it should be left on the Glitch page. Now that we have Missingno. on this page, we may aswell start new pages for other Glitch types for all of the other Glitch Pokémon, and that's just plain ridiculous. [[User:Tesh|Tesh]] 17:27, 19 September 2007 (UTC) | Lol. But seriously, it should be left on the Glitch page. Now that we have Missingno. on this page, we may aswell start new pages for other Glitch types for all of the other Glitch Pokémon, and that's just plain ridiculous. [[User:Tesh|Tesh]] 17:27, 19 September 2007 (UTC) | ||
:{{t|Bird}}. All I gotta say. Either way, no Missingno. should not appear here. '''[[User:TTEchidna|<span style="color:#FF0000;">T</span>]][[User talk:TTEchidna|<span style="color:#FF0000;">T</span>]][[wp:Echidna|<span style="color:#FF0000;">E</span><span style="color:#0000FF;">chidna</span>]]''' 17:36, 19 September 2007 (UTC) | :{{t|Bird}}. All I gotta say. Either way, no Missingno. should not appear here. '''[[User:TTEchidna|<span style="color:#FF0000;">T</span>]][[User talk:TTEchidna|<span style="color:#FF0000;">T</span>]][[wp:Echidna|<span style="color:#FF0000;">E</span><span style="color:#0000FF;">chidna</span>]]''' 17:36, 19 September 2007 (UTC) | ||
==FARFETCH'D!== | |||
Why isn't it on the list? | |||
== The Attack chart... == | == The Attack chart... == | ||
really needs to be completed. It's just wrong to have some attacks and not others, as well as inconveniant. We should put it up on other type pages, too.[[User:DittytheDitto|DittytheDitto]] 15:05, 15 December 2007 (UTC) | really needs to be completed. It's just wrong to have some attacks and not others, as well as inconveniant. We should put it up on other type pages, too.[[User:DittytheDitto|DittytheDitto]] 15:05, 15 December 2007 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 23:39, 14 July 2008
Glitch Pokémon?
Why is Missingno. included on this page? I thought only real Pokémon were included, like Pidgey, not Glitch or Fake Pokémon! Somebody explain to me why Missingo. should be kept on this page because I believe it should be removed. --Tesh 17:19, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
- Because Missingno. has a place in all our hearts and is our best glitchy friend. :) *cough* Well, it's one of the only (I believe?) glitch Pokémon to have a real type (Glitches like .4 have types like Pokémaniac and such) and after all, Missingno is just a very notable glitch. I say keep him. ;D TinaTheKirlia 17:22, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
Lol. But seriously, it should be left on the Glitch page. Now that we have Missingno. on this page, we may aswell start new pages for other Glitch types for all of the other Glitch Pokémon, and that's just plain ridiculous. Tesh 17:27, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
- Bird. All I gotta say. Either way, no Missingno. should not appear here. TTEchidna 17:36, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
FARFETCH'D!
Why isn't it on the list?
The Attack chart...
really needs to be completed. It's just wrong to have some attacks and not others, as well as inconveniant. We should put it up on other type pages, too.DittytheDitto 15:05, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
