Talk:Aaron: Difference between revisions
From Bulbapedia, the community-driven Pokémon encyclopedia.
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
:::does any one have a pic of the scan? i seen one once and i cant remember where =/--[[User:David aipom|Davidaipom]] 14:04, 29 June 2008 (UTC) | :::does any one have a pic of the scan? i seen one once and i cant remember where =/--[[User:David aipom|Davidaipom]] 14:04, 29 June 2008 (UTC) | ||
:::Wow, has that Australian magazine been right AGAIN? --[[User:Hey1031|Hey1031]] 18:53, 23 September 2008 (UTC) | :::Wow, has that Australian magazine been right AGAIN? --[[User:Hey1031|Hey1031]] 18:53, 23 September 2008 (UTC) | ||
::::Yup. Still, just because it's been right and right again, doesn't make it a reputable source. It's kind of silly, but if it says anything controversial (like the appearances of Wallace and Aaron in the Anime) again, we still can't trust it officially until it's confirmed. How they get their information is beyond me. [[User:Kumori Satosuke|Satosuke]] 00:14, 2 October 2008 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 00:14, 2 October 2008
About Aaron's appearance in the anime
I know the dreaded Austrailian magazine has been accurate somehow, but can we still assume that it's still a possibility? It's still not officially confirmed, despite what most want to think. --Ricco 00:24, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
- The magazine doesn't say "it is a possibility". The magazine says "it will happen". As long as we say it is according to the magazine - which can't be doubted at this point anyway - we should state it as it is. --FabuVinny |Talk Page| 13:51, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
- The way it's worded, it sounds like it's purely definite. I know the magazine has been right at this point, but what if this episode never happens? Then what? You know as well as I do that it's just as likely for it to not appear than it is to happen.
- All I'm saying is that I don't want people to think we're preaching a flawed scan as pure fact. I take these episodes with a grain of salt and I hope most of you do that as well. It's more or less the wording than the thought, really. =/ --Ricco 19:32, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
- does any one have a pic of the scan? i seen one once and i cant remember where =/--Davidaipom 14:04, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
- Wow, has that Australian magazine been right AGAIN? --Hey1031 18:53, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
- Yup. Still, just because it's been right and right again, doesn't make it a reputable source. It's kind of silly, but if it says anything controversial (like the appearances of Wallace and Aaron in the Anime) again, we still can't trust it officially until it's confirmed. How they get their information is beyond me. Satosuke 00:14, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
