Talk:PokéShipping/Featured article candidate: Difference between revisions

From Bulbapedia, the community-driven Pokémon encyclopedia.
Jump to navigationJump to search
m (→‎Object (1): updating count)
Line 4: Line 4:
*'''''Support!''''' Definitly the most detailed and the best shipping article there is.--[[User:Smartkidhen|Smartkidhen]] 20:51, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
*'''''Support!''''' Definitly the most detailed and the best shipping article there is.--[[User:Smartkidhen|Smartkidhen]] 20:51, 7 January 2010 (UTC)


====Object (1)====
====Object (2)====
<!--Please remember to update the count along with your vote.-->
<!--Please remember to update the count along with your vote.-->
* Eh. The prose isn't fantastic (written very casually, lots of contractions) and I think the POV nature of shipping makes it kind of a weak choice for a Featured Article. --[[User:Zesty Cactus|<span style="color:#006400">'''Zesty'''</span>]][[User talk:Zesty Cactus|<span style="color:#3CB371">'''Cactus'''</span>]] 21:23, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
* Eh. The prose isn't fantastic (written very casually, lots of contractions) and I think the POV nature of shipping makes it kind of a weak choice for a Featured Article. --[[User:Zesty Cactus|<span style="color:#006400">'''Zesty'''</span>]][[User talk:Zesty Cactus|<span style="color:#3CB371">'''Cactus'''</span>]] 21:23, 7 January 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 21:47, 7 January 2010

Shipping:PokéShipping

Support (1)

  • Support! Definitly the most detailed and the best shipping article there is.--Smartkidhen 20:51, 7 January 2010 (UTC)

Object (2)

  • Eh. The prose isn't fantastic (written very casually, lots of contractions) and I think the POV nature of shipping makes it kind of a weak choice for a Featured Article. --ZestyCactus 21:23, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
  • Too many personal opinions and theories that try to make the reader lean to a specific thought. Featured articles should present interesting facts, and the opinions shouldn't overwhelm those facts, which is what this article is doing. Dany36 21:47, 7 January 2010 (UTC)

Other comments