Talk:Berry/Featured article candidate: Difference between revisions

From Bulbapedia, the community-driven Pokémon encyclopedia.
Jump to navigationJump to search
mNo edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
==[[Berry]]==__NOTOC__
==[[Berry]]==__NOTOC__
====Support (3)====
====Support (4)====
<!--Please remember to update the count along with your vote.-->
<!--Please remember to update the count along with your vote.-->
*'''Support''' A very comprehensive article with information on every stage in the history of berries, from Gen II to Gen IV. Aesthetically pleasing, it is evident that a lot of time and effort went in to making the article what it is today. --[[User:RexRacer|'''<font color="#E7CE6B">Rex</font>]][[User talk:RexRacer|<font color="#42528C ">Racer</font>''']] 18:34, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
*'''Support''' A very comprehensive article with information on every stage in the history of berries, from Gen II to Gen IV. Aesthetically pleasing, it is evident that a lot of time and effort went in to making the article what it is today. --[[User:RexRacer|'''<font color="#E7CE6B">Rex</font>]][[User talk:RexRacer|<font color="#42528C ">Racer</font>''']] 18:34, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
*Very good and well written! Definitely worthy! [[User:Mudkipluvr4ever|Mudkipluvr4ever]] 18:56, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
*Very good and well written! Definitely worthy! [[User:Mudkipluvr4ever|Mudkipluvr4ever]] 18:56, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
*'''''Support!''''' Rex hit the nail on the head, it's very in depth and covers berries in all canon by a reasonable amount. Maybe [[Pokémon.com online games|Munchlax's Berry Bonanza]] and [[Swalot Plop]] could be given a mention. I could try writing something up on each if nobody else wants to. Besides that I think it meets the standard. And I'm assuming we're not looking to have ''every'' berry that appears in the anime included in the article? --'''<sup>[[user:Emp|Emp]], out</sup>''' 20:10, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
*'''''Support!''''' Rex hit the nail on the head, it's very in depth and covers berries in all canon by a reasonable amount. Maybe [[Pokémon.com online games|Munchlax's Berry Bonanza]] and [[Swalot Plop]] could be given a mention. I could try writing something up on each if nobody else wants to. Besides that I think it meets the standard. And I'm assuming we're not looking to have ''every'' berry that appears in the anime included in the article? --'''<sup>[[user:Emp|Emp]], out</sup>''' 20:10, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
*'''Support'''. Very comprehensive, uses templates where it should, seems to have everything necessary. --[[User:SnorlaxMonster|<span style="color:#A70000">'''Snorlax'''</span>]][[User talk:SnorlaxMonster|<span style="color:#0000A7">'''Monster'''</span>]] 10:44, 13 February 2010 (UTC)


====Object (1)====
====Object (1)====

Revision as of 10:44, 13 February 2010

Berry

Support (4)

  • Support A very comprehensive article with information on every stage in the history of berries, from Gen II to Gen IV. Aesthetically pleasing, it is evident that a lot of time and effort went in to making the article what it is today. --RexRacer 18:34, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
  • Very good and well written! Definitely worthy! Mudkipluvr4ever 18:56, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
  • Support! Rex hit the nail on the head, it's very in depth and covers berries in all canon by a reasonable amount. Maybe Munchlax's Berry Bonanza and Swalot Plop could be given a mention. I could try writing something up on each if nobody else wants to. Besides that I think it meets the standard. And I'm assuming we're not looking to have every berry that appears in the anime included in the article? --Emp, out 20:10, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
  • Support. Very comprehensive, uses templates where it should, seems to have everything necessary. --SnorlaxMonster 10:44, 13 February 2010 (UTC)

Object (1)

  • I think that there are better articles than this one that could be an FAC article. - Pokémon1234567890 19:49, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
    • How does this mean the article isn't good enough for FAC? Turtwig A (talk | contribs) 21:51, 7 February 2010 (UTC)

Other comments