User talk:SnorlaxMonster/TTEchidna/Animeteams: Difference between revisions
From Bulbapedia, the community-driven Pokémon encyclopedia.
Jump to navigationJump to search
Kenji-girl (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
(→So.) |
||
Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
Anyone think this could be a good article if in the main namespace? It'd all end up on one page, rather than seven... '''[[User:TTEchidna|<span style="color:#FF0000">''TTE''</span>]][[User talk:TTEchidna|chidna]]''' 01:41, 6 August 2008 (UTC) | Anyone think this could be a good article if in the main namespace? It'd all end up on one page, rather than seven... '''[[User:TTEchidna|<span style="color:#FF0000">''TTE''</span>]][[User talk:TTEchidna|chidna]]''' 01:41, 6 August 2008 (UTC) | ||
:But then it wouldn't be as funny. But I suppose we could use it. --[[Special:Contributions/Kenji-girl|<span style="color:#0005CD;">☆</span>]][[Tracey Sketchit|<span style="color:#15E200;">'''ケンジ'''</span>]][[User:Kenji-girl|<span style="color:#DC0062;">'''ガール'''</span>]] 01:46, 6 August 2008 (UTC) | :But then it wouldn't be as funny. But I suppose we could use it. --[[Special:Contributions/Kenji-girl|<span style="color:#0005CD;">☆</span>]][[Tracey Sketchit|<span style="color:#15E200;">'''ケンジ'''</span>]][[User:Kenji-girl|<span style="color:#DC0062;">'''ガール'''</span>]] 01:46, 6 August 2008 (UTC) | ||
::Doesn't mean I'd have to delete the commentary... '''[[User:TTEchidna|<span style="color:#FF0000">''TTE''</span>]][[User talk:TTEchidna|chidna]]''' 02:15, 6 August 2008 (UTC) |
Revision as of 02:15, 6 August 2008
I just got one question. Why didn't you make one for Misty?? Force Fire
I've got the same question-Why in the world did you leave out Misty and instead did one for Tracey????Misty-may-dawn rulz
- Well, for one, Tracey was easier to complete one for as opposed to Misty. --Shiningpikablu252 16:22, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
But Misty was a more important main charecter than Tracey! (and in my opinion, VERY beautiful too!) Misty-may-dawn rulz 10:25, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
- Well, two things:
So.
Anyone think this could be a good article if in the main namespace? It'd all end up on one page, rather than seven... TTEchidna 01:41, 6 August 2008 (UTC)