User talk:Shiningpikablu252/Archive 70707-100707: Difference between revisions
mNo edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
:::Read what I just put on your user talk page. We don't need to be putting essentially the same stuff on two user talk pages at once, especially stuff concerning illegal bullsh*t. --[[User:Shiningpikablu252|Shiningpikablu252]] 18:38, 21 August 2007 (UTC) | :::Read what I just put on your user talk page. We don't need to be putting essentially the same stuff on two user talk pages at once, especially stuff concerning illegal bullsh*t. --[[User:Shiningpikablu252|Shiningpikablu252]] 18:38, 21 August 2007 (UTC) | ||
==The Secret Page== | |||
Yes. I will remove all of the signatures until it doesn't show up. --[[User:Shiny Noctowl|Shiny Noctowl]] 20:21, 22 August 2007 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 20:21, 22 August 2007
Hey, thanks for creating the Harley's Pokémon template. However, I have to ask you to please use the {{P}} template when linking to Pokémon articles. For example, use {{p|Ariados}} instead of [[Ariados]]. Otherwise, you might unwittingly link to a disambiguation page. Thanks! --PAK Man Talk 01:52, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
Also, don't use "you" in articles. It's bad form to talk to the readers. --TTEchidna 21:51, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
The link templates are very important. Please use them instead of square brackets for Pokémon species, moves, types, and many other things, lest you link to a disambiguation page like Pikachu. TTEchidna 22:36, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
Thanks
Thanks for correcting me on that user's talk page. I guess I was so frustrated with everything they've done, I wasn't concentrating. I've amended my mistake. Again, thank you for correcting me. --PAK Man Talk 20:26, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
Just a few things
I just wanted to let you know that you should always be sure to check facts and existing articles, especially when making a new article. Also, please only categorize your user page with user groups. -Happy Mask Man 21:32, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
Hack
What's wrong with the article hack? --Shiny Noctowl 18:28, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
- The article's entire premise is not notable. Do we need an article about something illegal? No, we do not. If we were to consider the Hack article notable, then we'd have to consider articles about stuff such as AdvanceMap, GoldMap, and other ROM editors notable as well, along with articles about stuff such as Quartz, Chaos Black, and the like. If that stuff was to be considered notable, Bulbapedia would be a mess. --Shiningpikablu252 18:34, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
- What do you mean, "its entire premise was not notable"? --Shiny Noctowl 18:33, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
- Read what I just put on your user talk page. We don't need to be putting essentially the same stuff on two user talk pages at once, especially stuff concerning illegal bullsh*t. --Shiningpikablu252 18:38, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
The Secret Page
Yes. I will remove all of the signatures until it doesn't show up. --Shiny Noctowl 20:21, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
