User talk:AquaDragon: Difference between revisions
AquaDragon (talk | contribs) |
|||
Line 58: | Line 58: | ||
:oh, OK I can see why that's not a good name. Prior to that I was thinking of "characteristics"(misleading), "intrinsic properties" (too complicated) or "traits" (they sound like characteristics), but I think "Individuality" sounds good. ---> '''[[User:AquaDragon|{{color|6890F0|Aqua}}]][[User_talk:AquaDragon|{{color|7038F8|Dragon}}]]''' 13:47, 22 December 2010 (UTC) | :oh, OK I can see why that's not a good name. Prior to that I was thinking of "characteristics"(misleading), "intrinsic properties" (too complicated) or "traits" (they sound like characteristics), but I think "Individuality" sounds good. ---> '''[[User:AquaDragon|{{color|6890F0|Aqua}}]][[User_talk:AquaDragon|{{color|7038F8|Dragon}}]]''' 13:47, 22 December 2010 (UTC) | ||
:i'm thinking we should put the brackets in [i.e. Effort values(EVs)], because i am sure there are people who know what EVs are, but not know what it stands for. ---> '''[[User:AquaDragon|{{color|6890F0|Aqua}}]][[User_talk:AquaDragon|{{color|7038F8|Dragon}}]]''' 13:52, 22 December 2010 (UTC) | :i'm thinking we should put the brackets in [i.e. Effort values(EVs)], because i am sure there are people who know what EVs are, but not know what it stands for. ---> '''[[User:AquaDragon|{{color|6890F0|Aqua}}]][[User_talk:AquaDragon|{{color|7038F8|Dragon}}]]''' 13:52, 22 December 2010 (UTC) | ||
::Not really necessary for a navigation template: if they don't know what it stands for, they would search for it and be redirected. Plenty of locations have changed name between games, but we don't put both in the navigation templates. --[[User:SnorlaxMonster|<span style="color:#A70000">'''Snorlax'''</span>]][[User talk:SnorlaxMonster|<span style="color:#0000A7">'''Monster'''</span>]] 13:59, 22 December 2010 (UTC) |
Revision as of 13:59, 22 December 2010
Welcome
| |||||
|
Headbutt
Can I ask that when you add them (but it looks like you're done anyway) that you don't put "(Pre-National Pokédex)". This is misleading as they can be found post-National Pokédex as well. The post-National Pokédex note can stay though, as it needs to be there. See the few that I changed if you don't understand. Thanks for your contributions! --SnorlaxMonster 04:40, 20 November 2010 (UTC)
oh gosh, im done with the kanto part already. >_< ok, thanks for pointing that out, i'll keep that in mind when doing the johto part. --> AquaDragon (talk) 04:44, 20 November 2010 (UTC)
- Don't worry, I'll handle them. You can go add the Johto ones. --SnorlaxMonster 04:46, 20 November 2010 (UTC)
- Is it possible that you meant special tree rather than post-National Pokédex? --SnorlaxMonster 05:56, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
Pokémon Development
I don't think that is a good name for that template. I can see what they have in common, and I would say the best option is something like "Individuality" or "Pokémon individuality", since things like IVs are not developed. --SnorlaxMonster 13:39, 22 December 2010 (UTC)
- oh, OK I can see why that's not a good name. Prior to that I was thinking of "characteristics"(misleading), "intrinsic properties" (too complicated) or "traits" (they sound like characteristics), but I think "Individuality" sounds good. ---> AquaDragon 13:47, 22 December 2010 (UTC)
- i'm thinking we should put the brackets in [i.e. Effort values(EVs)], because i am sure there are people who know what EVs are, but not know what it stands for. ---> AquaDragon 13:52, 22 December 2010 (UTC)